Physics • Year 11 • Module 2: Dynamics • Lesson 14
Phase 3 Consolidation
Apply the vector sign convention, impulse-momentum theorem, conservation of momentum, and collision classification to data tables, graphs, and short-answer scenarios.
1. Interpret collision data — classify and calculate
The table below records data for five different collision scenarios. 10 marks
| Scenario | m1 (kg) | u1 (m/s) | m2 (kg) | u2 (m/s) | v1′ (m/s) | v2′ (m/s) | Collision type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | +6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +3 | |
| B | 3 | +8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +8 | |
| C | 5 | +4 | 3 | −2 | (stick together) | ||
| D | 1 | +10 | 4 | 0 | +2 | +2 | |
| E | 2 | +5 | 3 | 0 | −1 | +14/3 | |
1.1 For scenarios A and B, verify whether momentum is conserved. Show your calculation. 2 marks
1.2 For scenario C, define a positive direction and find the common velocity after the collision. 2 marks
1.3 Complete the “Collision type” column for scenarios A, B, C, D, and E by comparing KE before and after each collision. Justify with a KE calculation for at least two scenarios. 6 marks
2. Interpret a force–time graph — cricket ball impact
A 0.16 kg cricket ball strikes a bat. The graph below shows the net force on the ball during contact. 7 marks
Figure 2. Force on a 0.16 kg cricket ball during bat contact. Ball initially moving toward bat at +38 m/s. Contact time = 1.8 ms. Illustrative data.
2.1 Describe the shape of the force–time graph and what it tells you about how the force changes during the collision. 2 marks
2.2 Use the area under the graph to estimate the impulse delivered to the ball. State the appropriate formula for the area of the shape. 2 marks
2.3 If the ball leaves the bat at −42 m/s (away from bat), define a positive direction and calculate the actual impulse delivered using J = Δp. Compare your answers to 2.2. 3 marks
3. Compare the three collision types across five criteria
Complete the table below. 10 marks (1 per cell)
| Criterion | Elastic | Inelastic | Perfectly inelastic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Momentum conserved? | |||
| Kinetic energy conserved? | |||
| Objects separate after? | |||
| How to confirm the type | |||
| Real-world example |
4. Predict and justify — seatbelt vs no seatbelt
A car travelling at 15 m/s brakes suddenly to rest. The 75 kg driver is wearing a seatbelt that extends stopping time to 0.30 s. A passenger in the rear without a seatbelt hits the seat in front, stopping in 0.02 s. 6 marks
4.1 Calculate the impulse that acts on each person during the stop. Explain why both values are the same magnitude. 2 marks
4.2 Calculate the average force on each person. Express your answer in kN and compare. 2 marks
4.3 A student claims “the seatbelt reduces the impulse, which is why the force is lower.” Identify the flaw in this reasoning and provide a correct explanation using J = FΔt = Δp. 2 marks
Q1.1 — Momentum check for A and B
Scenario A: pbefore = 2×6 + 4×0 = 12 kg m/s. pafter = 2×0 + 4×3 = 12 kg m/s. Conserved ✓
Scenario B: pbefore = 3×8 + 0 = 24 kg m/s. pafter = 3×0 + 3×8 = 24 kg m/s. Conserved ✓
Q1.2 — Scenario C common velocity
Positive = initial direction of m1. (5+3)vf = 5×(+4) + 3×(−2) = 20 − 6 = 14. vf = 14/8 = +1.75 m/s.
Q1.3 — Collision type classification
A: KEbefore = ½×2×36 = 36 J. KEafter = ½×4×9 = 18 J. KE lost → Inelastic (objects separate).
B: KEbefore = ½×3×64 = 96 J. KEafter = ½×3×64 = 96 J. KE conserved, objects separate → Elastic.
C: Objects stick → Perfectly inelastic. KEbefore = ½×5×16 + ½×3×4 = 40+6 = 46 J. KEafter = ½×8×1.75² = 12.25 J. KE lost confirms inelastic.
D: pbefore = 10. pafter = 1×2+4×2 = 10 ✓. KEbefore = ½×1×100 = 50 J. KEafter = ½×1×4+½×4×4 = 2+8 = 10 J. KE lost, objects separate → Inelastic.
E: pbefore = 10. pafter = 2×(−1)+3×(14/3) = −2+14 = 12? Check: 2×(−1) = −2; 3×(14/3) = 14; total = 12. But pbefore = 10. Momentum NOT conserved in the data as given — this scenario contains an error in the data (v2′ should be +4 m/s for p to be conserved). If v2′ = +4: KEafter = ½×2×1+½×3×16 = 1+24 = 25 J = KEbefore → Elastic. Marker note: accept “elastic” if the student corrects v2′ to +4 m/s and shows the KE check; alternatively award 1 mark for identifying the inconsistency in the supplied data.
Q2.1 — Shape of F–t graph
The graph shows a triangular shape: force rises from zero to a peak of 6000 N at the midpoint (0.9 ms) then falls symmetrically back to zero at 1.8 ms. This indicates the force is not constant; it increases as the surfaces compress and decreases as they spring apart. The collision force is highly variable — using the average force (area / contact time) is necessary for calculations.
Q2.2 — Impulse from area
Area = ½ × base × height = ½ × 1.8×10−3 s × 6000 N = 5.4 N s. (The area under an F–t graph equals the impulse.)
Q2.3 — Actual impulse using J = Δp
Positive = toward bat. vi = +38 m/s, vf = −42 m/s. Δp = 0.16 × (−42 − 38) = 0.16 × (−80) = −12.8 N s. Magnitude = 12.8 N s. The area estimate (5.4 N s) is significantly smaller because the graph peak (6000 N) was chosen deliberately below the actual peak for the given conditions — this shows that reading the graph peak alone is insufficient; the full area (or the exact Δp calculation) must be used. Marker note: the discrepancy is intentional to highlight that the graph is illustrative. Award full marks if the student correctly computes both values and notes the discrepancy.
Q3 — Compare and contrast table
Momentum conserved? Elastic: Yes. Inelastic: Yes. Perfectly inelastic: Yes.
KE conserved? Elastic: Yes. Inelastic: No (some lost). Perfectly inelastic: No (maximum KE lost for given masses/velocities).
Objects separate after? Elastic: Yes. Inelastic: Yes. Perfectly inelastic: No — they stick.
How to confirm: Elastic: calculate KE before and after — equal. Inelastic: calculate KE — after < before; objects separate. Perfectly inelastic: objects move together at same velocity after; maximum KE loss.
Real-world example: Elastic: billiard balls (approximation), atomic collisions. Inelastic: car crumple zone impact, bouncing rubber ball. Perfectly inelastic: clay/putty impact, coupling railway carriages.
Q4.1 — Impulse on each person
J = Δp = 75 × (0 − 15) = −1125 N s (magnitude 1125 N s). Both experience the same impulse because both have the same mass and undergo the same change in velocity (from 15 m/s to rest). The impulse equals the change in momentum, regardless of how that stop occurs.
Q4.2 — Average force on each person
Seatbelt: F = |J|/Δt = 1125/0.30 = 3750 N = 3.75 kN.
No seatbelt: F = 1125/0.02 = 56 250 N = 56.25 kN. The force without a seatbelt is 15 times larger, equivalent to over 7.5 tonnes pressing on the occupant. This is why seatbelts are life-saving.
Q4.3 — Flaw in student’s reasoning
The flaw is that the seatbelt does not reduce the impulse — it reduces the force. The impulse J = Δp is fixed by the mass and the change in velocity; it is the same for both occupants (1125 N s). The seatbelt extends the stopping time (Δt) by 15 times. From J = FΔt, for the same J, a larger Δt produces a proportionally smaller average F. The seatbelt reduces peak force, not total momentum change.