Three printable worksheets that build from foundations to mastery — or build your own from any module’s questions.
68–95–99.7: unlock the power of standard deviations in a normal distribution.
In a class where exam marks are normally distributed with mean 70 and standard deviation 10, roughly what percentage of students would you expect to score between 60 and 80? How did you arrive at that estimate?
60 and 80 are each exactly one standard deviation from the mean (70 ± 10). The empirical rule tells us that approximately 68% of data lies within one standard deviation of the mean. So about 68% of students scored between 60 and 80.
For any normally distributed dataset with mean μ and standard deviation σ:
| Interval | Approximate percentage of data |
|---|---|
| μ − σ to μ + σ (within 1 standard deviation) | 68% |
| μ − 2σ to μ + 2σ (within 2 standard deviations) | 95% |
| μ − 3σ to μ + 3σ (within 3 standard deviations) | 99.7% |
Quick check: What percentage of normally distributed data lies within 2 standard deviations of the mean?
To apply the empirical rule, first identify how many standard deviations each boundary is from the mean.
Worked example: IQ scores are normally distributed with μ = 100, σ = 15. What percentage of people have IQ between 70 and 130?
Worked example 2: What percentage have IQ between 85 and 115?
Quick check: A dataset has μ = 50, σ = 5. What percentage lies between 35 and 65?
The empirical rule gives two-sided (symmetric) percentages. Use symmetry to find one-sided percentages.
Key facts derived from symmetry:
Worked example: μ = 100, σ = 15. What percentage have IQ above 130?
Quick check: In a normal distribution with μ = 60, σ = 8, approximately what percentage of data is above 76?
More complex questions ask for intervals between different multiples of σ. Use the empirical rule plus subtraction.
Example: μ = 100, σ = 15. What percentage lies between 85 and 115 but NOT between 70 and 130?
This asks: what is in the 95% band but not in the 68% band?
Similarly, between 2σ and 3σ on each side: (99.7 − 95) ÷ 2 = 2.35%.
Quick check: In a normal distribution, what percentage of data lies between μ + σ and μ + 2σ?
A value is considered unusual if it falls more than 2 standard deviations from the mean. This is because only about 5% of data lies outside the 2σ band — making such values relatively rare.
Worked example: A factory produces bolts with length μ = 10 mm, σ = 0.2 mm. A bolt measures 10.5 mm. Is this unusual?
Quick check: A dataset has μ = 200 and σ = 25. Is the value 260 unusual?
Exam scores in a large test are normally distributed with μ = 65, σ = 12. Find:
A machine fills juice bottles with μ = 500 mL, σ = 8 mL. Determine whether each bottle is unusual. Show working.
1. In a normal distribution with μ = 30 and σ = 4, what percentage of data lies between 22 and 38?
B. 22 = 30 − 8 = μ − 2σ and 38 = 30 + 8 = μ + 2σ. Within 2 standard deviations → 95%.
2. The heights of plants are normally distributed with μ = 45 cm, σ = 6 cm. Approximately what percentage of plants are taller than 57 cm?
C. 57 = 45 + 12 = μ + 2σ. The percentage above μ + 2σ is 5% ÷ 2 = 2.5%.
3. What percentage of normally distributed data lies between μ − 2σ and μ − σ?
C. Between 1σ and 2σ on one side: (95 − 68) ÷ 2 = 13.5%.
4. A dataset has μ = 150 and σ = 20. Which value would be considered unusual?
D. (95 − 150) ÷ 20 = −2.75. This is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean, so it is unusual. Options A, B, C are all within 2σ.
5. In a normal distribution, approximately what percentage of data lies more than 3 standard deviations from the mean?
B. 99.7% lies within 3σ, so 100 − 99.7 = 0.3% lies outside.
SAQ 1. Newborn baby weights are approximately normally distributed with μ = 3.4 kg, σ = 0.5 kg. (a) What percentage of babies weigh between 2.4 kg and 4.4 kg? (b) A baby weighs 2.2 kg. Is this an unusual weight? Show your working. (c) What percentage of babies weigh more than 3.9 kg?
(a) 2.4 = 3.4 − 1.0 = μ − 2σ and 4.4 = 3.4 + 1.0 = μ + 2σ. Within 2σ → approximately 95%.
(b) (2.2 − 3.4) ÷ 0.5 = −1.2 ÷ 0.5 = −2.4. Since |−2.4| > 2, this weight is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean → unusual.
(c) 3.9 = 3.4 + 0.5 = μ + σ. The percentage above μ + σ is 32% ÷ 2 = 16%.
SAQ 2. Draw a fully labelled normal distribution diagram for a dataset with μ = 20 and σ = 3. Mark the values at μ ± σ, μ ± 2σ, and μ ± 3σ on the x-axis. Label the percentage of data in each region between consecutive standard deviation marks.
x-axis values: 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29. Regions from left to right: 0.15% | 2.35% | 13.5% | 34% | 34% | 13.5% | 2.35% | 0.15%. These sum to approximately 99.7% (with 0.3% in the extreme tails beyond 3σ).
MC 1: B | MC 2: C | MC 3: C | MC 4: D | MC 5: B
SAQ 1: (a) 95%; (b) −2.4 SDs → unusual; (c) 16%.
SAQ 2: Bell curve with x-values 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29 and regions 0.15%, 2.35%, 13.5%, 34%, 34%, 13.5%, 2.35%, 0.15%.
Can you recite the empirical rule from memory (68–95–99.7) and use it to find one-sided probabilities and identify unusual values? Can you draw the labelled bell curve with all seven σ-boundary regions?