Mathematics Standard • Year 12 • Module 6 • Lesson 11

Mixed Project Problems — Past-Paper Style

Practise HSC Mathematics Standard 2-style writing on multi-step project problems combining scans, critical path and crashing.

Master · Past-Paper Style

1. Short-answer questions

1.1 A project has: A(3,−), B(4,A), C(2,A), D(5,B), E(3,C), F(2,D,E). (a) Carry out a forward scan. (b) State the project duration.    3 marks    Band 3

1.2 Same network as 1.1. (a) Carry out a backward scan. (b) State the critical path and the floats of non-critical activities.    3 marks    Band 3-4

1.3 Same network as 1.1. Crash options: D normal 5 → crash 4 days at +$500; F normal 2 → crash 1 day at +$300.
(a) Calculate the new project duration if both crashes are applied.
(b) State the total crash cost.
(c) Indirect cost is $200/day. Was the crash worthwhile? Justify in one sentence.    4 marks    Band 4

Stuck on 1.3(c)? Direct extra ($800) vs indirect saved (2 days × $200 = $400). Net = +$400.

2. Extended response

2.1 A construction company is fitting out a NSW retail premises.

Activity table (days):

A. Strip-out (3, no predecessor)

B. Slab repair (4, A)

C. Wall framing (2, A)

D. Plumbing (5, B)

E. Electrical (3, C)

F. Drywall (2, D and E)

G. Fit-out (4, F)

Crash options: D 5→3 at +$1,000 total; F 2→1 at +$400; G 4→3 at +$300. Indirect cost = $300/day. The shop must open within 14 days or a $500/day late-opening penalty applies.

(a) Carry out forward and backward scans for all 7 activities. State the project duration and the critical path. (b) Calculate the total cost at the normal project duration (direct + indirect + any penalty). Use direct cost $25,000. (c) Find the minimum-cost duration. Show your working in a table comparing the normal duration plus three crash options. End with an explicit conclusion sentence naming the optimal duration and the minimum total cost.    7 marks    Band 5-6

Explicit marking criteria

Part (a) — 3 marks

1 mark — correct forward scan (ES, EF for all 7 activities).

1 mark — correct backward scan (LS, LF) and critical path stated as A → B → D → F → G.

1 mark — project duration stated as 18 days.

Part (b) — 2 marks

1 mark — indirect cost computed at 18 × $300 = $5,400; penalty 4 × $500 = $2,000.

1 mark — total cost stated as $32,400 with all three components shown.

Part (c) — 2 marks

1 mark — table of total costs at progressively crashed durations including 16, 15, 14 days, with cheapest crashes selected (G $300, F $400, D $500/day).

1 mark — explicit conclusion sentence naming the optimal duration (14 days) and total cost ($30,900).

Your response:

Stuck on (c)? Above day 14, penalty bites — savings per day = $300 + $500 = $800. At/below day 14, only $300/day saving.

How did this worksheet feel?

What I'll revisit before next class:

Answers — sample responses + marking notes

1.1 — Forward scan (3 marks)

Sample response.
A: ES=0, EF=3.
B: ES=3, EF=7.
C: ES=3, EF=5.
D: ES=7, EF=12.
E: ES=5, EF=8.
F: ES = max(12, 8) = 12, EF = 14.
Project duration = 14 days.

Marking notes. 1 mark — A, B, C correct. 1 mark — D, E, F correct (including max at F). 1 mark — duration stated.

1.2 — Backward scan + critical path (3 marks)

Sample response.
F: LF=14, LS=12.
D: LF=12, LS=7.
E: LF=12, LS=9.
B: LF=7, LS=3.
C: LF=9, LS=7.
A: LF = min(3, 7) = 3, LS = 0.
Floats: A=0, B=0, C=4, D=0, E=4, F=0. Critical path: A → B → D → F. C float = 4, E float = 4.

Marking notes. 1 mark — backward scan all six. 1 mark — A: LF = min(3,7) = 3. 1 mark — critical path and floats stated correctly.

1.3 — Crashing D + F (4 marks)

(a) Both D and F critical. D 5→4 reduces critical by 1. F 2→1 reduces by another 1. New duration = 12 days.

(b) Crash cost = $500 + $300 = $800.

(c) Indirect saving = 2 × $200 = $400. Net = $800 − $400 = +$400. No — the crash makes the project $400 more expensive overall. Worth it only if there's an external benefit (deadline, penalty avoided) not stated here.

Marking notes. (a) 1 mark — new duration. (b) 1 mark — crash cost. (c) 2 marks — explicit comparison and conclusion sentence.

2.1 — Retail fit-out (7 marks): sample Band-6 response with annotations

Sample Band-6 response.

(a) Scans + critical path.

Forward: A(0,3), B(3,7), C(3,5), D(7,12), E(5,8), F(max(12,8)=12, 14), G(14,18). [1 mark]

Backward: G(18,14), F(14,12), D(12,7), E(12,9), B(7,3), C(9,7), A(min(3,7)=3, 0). Floats: A=B=D=F=G=0; C=4, E=4. Critical path: A → B → D → F → G. [1 mark]
Project duration = 18 days. [1 mark]

(b) Cost at normal duration.

Direct $25,000. Indirect = 18 × $300 = $5,400. Days past 14 = 4 days. Penalty = 4 × $500 = $2,000. [1 mark — indirect and penalty]
Total cost at 18 days = $25,000 + $5,400 + $2,000 = $32,400. [1 mark]

(c) Optimal duration.

Slopes for critical activities: D $500/day (max 2 days), F $400/day (max 1 day), G $300/day (max 1 day). Cheapest first: G ($300), F ($400), D ($500).
Effective saving per day above day 14: $300 indirect + $500 penalty = $800/day. At/below day 14: $300/day only.

Table (direct $25,000 + crash + indirect + penalty):
Day 18 (no crash): $25,000 + 0 + $5,400 + $2,000 = $32,400.
Day 17 (crash G 1, $300): $25,000 + $300 + 17×$300 + 3×$500 = $25,000 + $300 + $5,100 + $1,500 = $31,900.
Day 16 (G 1 + F 1, $300 + $400 = $700): $25,000 + $700 + 16×$300 + 2×$500 = $25,000 + $700 + $4,800 + $1,000 = $31,500.
Day 15 (G 1 + F 1 + D 1, $700 + $500 = $1,200): $25,000 + $1,200 + 15×$300 + 1×$500 = $25,000 + $1,200 + $4,500 + $500 = $31,200.
Day 14 (G 1 + F 1 + D 2, $1,200 + $500 = $1,700): $25,000 + $1,700 + 14×$300 + 0 = $25,000 + $1,700 + $4,200 = $30,900.
Day 13 — only D has crashing capacity left (already used 2 of 2; F used 1 of 1; G used 1 of 1). Cannot crash further. [1 mark — table]

Conclusion: the optimal duration is 14 days at a total cost of $30,900. Crashing G, F, and D fully (with no penalty remaining) is cheaper than the normal 18-day schedule by $1,500. [1 mark — explicit conclusion with duration and total]

Total: 7/7.

Band descriptors for marker.

Band 3: Forward scan and critical path correct; cost calculation omits penalty or duration. ≈ 3 marks.

Band 4: Scans correct; total at 18 correct; attempts crashing but doesn't switch the "saving per day" calculation at day 14. ≈ 5 marks.

Band 5: Full table; identifies 14 days as optimal but conclusion sentence vague or lacks dollar value. ≈ 6 marks.

Band 6: All scans, total at 18, table with $300+$500 above day 14 and $300 below; explicit conclusion sentence naming 14 days AND $30,900. 7/7.