Mixed Integration Problems II
By now you have every Extension 2 integration technique in your kit: $u$-substitution, trig substitution, partial fractions, integration by parts, the IBP reduction loop, and the $t = \tan(x/2)$ trick. This lesson stacks them — most HSC questions in MEX-C1 combine two or three techniques, and the definite-integral marks are won or lost on careful limit substitution. You will work three full-length problems start to finish.
For each integrand below, name the first technique you would reach for. Don't compute — just commit to a strategy. (a) $\int x^2 e^{x}\,dx$ (b) $\int \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}\,dx$ (c) $\int \dfrac{2x+3}{x^2+x-2}\,dx$ (d) $\int_0^{\pi/2} \sin^5 x\,dx$.
Two habits separate a clean HSC solution from a messy one: declare the technique before computing, and change the limits the moment you substitute (never carry old limits onto new variables). Mixed problems usually need a chain — sub then parts, or sub then partial fractions — so each layer must be stated explicitly.
The declare-substitute-relimit-resolve habit: (1) declare $u = \ldots$ and write $du$; (2) substitute the integrand AND $dx$; (3) change limits $x = a, b \mapsto u = u(a), u(b)$; (4) finish with the new technique on the new variable.
$\int_a^b f(g(x))g'(x)\,dx = \int_{g(a)}^{g(b)} f(u)\,du$
Key facts
- Limits in a definite integral must transform with every substitution
- A linear-over-quadratic fraction usually needs a $u = $ denominator split followed by completing the square
- IBP often turns up after a substitution simplifies the integrand
- $\int_0^a f(x)\,dx + \int_0^a f(a-x)\,dx = 2\int_0^a f(x)\,dx$ when $f$ is symmetric about $a/2$
Concepts
- Why mixed problems demand a written plan before any algebra
- Why changing limits removes the need to back-substitute and reduces error
- How to recognise when a substitution converts an unfamiliar form into a standard one
Skills
- Combine substitution with by parts in a single problem
- Combine substitution with partial fractions, including completing the square
- Handle definite integrals with careful limit transformation, leaving exact-form answers
An integrand like $\int \sin(\sqrt{x})\,dx$ resists IBP directly (you cannot easily integrate $\sin(\sqrt{x})$). Substitution clears the inner function first; then IBP handles the polynomial-times-trig that remains.
- Spot the inner mess. Identify a composition $f(g(x))$ where $g(x)$ is a root, exponential or trig.
- Substitute to clear it. Let $u = g(x)$, compute $dx$ in terms of $du$.
- Look at what's left. Usually a product of polynomial and elementary function — apply IBP.
Worked through the hook: $\int_0^{1} \dfrac{x^3}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\,dx$. Trig substitution $x = \sin\theta$ gives $dx = \cos\theta\,d\theta$ and $\sqrt{1-x^2} = \cos\theta$. The integrand becomes $\sin^3\theta\,d\theta$. New limits: $x=0 \to \theta=0$, $x=1 \to \theta = \pi/2$. Then write $\sin^3\theta = \sin\theta(1-\cos^2\theta)$ and substitute again $w = \cos\theta$. Two layers, one clean answer.
Layering rule: substitution first when there is an inner function; IBP/partial fractions next · Change limits with each substitution (or back-substitute at the end — pick one) · Trig substitution: $\sqrt{a^2 - x^2} \Rightarrow x = a\sin\theta$; $\sqrt{a^2 + x^2} \Rightarrow x = a\tan\theta$; $\sqrt{x^2 - a^2} \Rightarrow x = a\sec\theta$
Pause — copy the layering rule (substitution first, then IBP or partial fractions), the three trig-substitution pairs ($\sqrt{a^2-x^2}\to a\sin\theta$ etc.), and the limit-changing instruction into your book.
Quick check: For $\int_0^{1} x^2 \sqrt{1-x^2}\,dx$, which first move is best?
We just saw the layering rule for substitution + IBP: apply substitution first when an inner function is present, then IBP; change limits with each substitution or back-substitute at the end. That raises a question: what about substitution followed by partial fractions — what are the common forms that arise? This card answers it → $e^x/e^x$ multiplication converts an exponential denominator; complete the square for a quadratic; split the numerator for $\ln + \arctan$; $t = \tan(x/2)$ for rational trig.
Rational expressions with an exponential or trigonometric inner function become standard rationals after a clever substitution. Two recurring patterns:
- Exponential rationals. $\int \dfrac{1}{e^{x} + e^{-x}}\,dx$ — multiply top and bottom by $e^{x}$, then substitute $u = e^{x}$ to get a standard $\dfrac{du}{u^2 + 1}$.
- $t = \tan(x/2)$ Weierstrass. Converts $\sin x$, $\cos x$ into rational functions of $t$, which partial fractions can finish.
Completing the square as a partial-fractions preprocessor. If the denominator is an irreducible quadratic like $x^2 + 2x + 5$, complete the square: $(x+1)^2 + 4$. Then $u = x + 1$ converts to $u^2 + 4$, which has standard $\arctan$ antiderivative.
Exponential-in-denominator: multiply by $e^x/e^x$, then $u = e^x$ · Irreducible quadratic denominator: complete the square, then $u = x + b/2$ · Linear over quadratic: split numerator into (derivative-of-denom part) + (constant part) — $\ln + \arctan$ · $t = \tan(x/2)$ Weierstrass: $\sin x = \tfrac{2t}{1+t^2}$, $\cos x = \tfrac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}$, $dx = \tfrac{2}{1+t^2}dt$
Paste — copy the four substitution + partial-fraction patterns (exponential denominator → multiply $e^x/e^x$; irreducible quadratic → complete the square + shift; linear/quadratic → split numerator; rational trig → $t$-sub with three Weierstrass formulas) into your book.
Did you get this? True or false: to evaluate $\int_0^{\ln 2} \dfrac{e^{x}}{e^{2x} + 1}\,dx$, the substitution $u = e^{x}$ converts the integral to $\int_1^{2} \dfrac{du}{u^2 + 1}$.
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} \frac{x^3}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}\,dx$. Leave the answer in exact form.
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} e^{\sqrt{x}}\,dx$. Leave the answer in exact form.
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} \frac{2x + 3}{x^2 + 2x + 5}\,dx$. Leave the answer in exact form.
Fill the gap: When the substitution $u = g(x)$ converts $\int_a^b f(g(x))g'(x)\,dx$ to a $u$-integral, the new lower limit is and the new upper limit is .
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Did you get this? True or false: after the substitution $u = \cos\theta$ with $\theta \in [0, \pi/2]$, the limits become $u \in [1, 0]$ and the minus sign from $du = -\sin\theta\,d\theta$ can be absorbed by swapping the limits to $\int_0^1$.
Activities · practice with the ideas
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi/2} \sin^3\theta \cos^2\theta\,d\theta$. (Hint: keep one $\sin$, convert the rest, then substitute $u = \cos\theta$.)
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{\ln 2} \frac{e^{x}}{e^{2x} + 4}\,dx$ in exact form. (Hint: substitute $u = e^{x}$.)
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_1^{e} x\ln x\,dx$. (Hint: integration by parts.)
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} \frac{x}{x^2 + 4x + 5}\,dx$. (Hint: split numerator, then complete the square.)
Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} \arctan x\,dx$. (Hint: IBP with $f = \arctan x$, $dg = dx$.)
Odd one out: Three of these integrals are best tackled by integration by parts as the FIRST move. Which one is NOT?
Earlier you committed to a first technique for $\int_0^{1} \dfrac{x^3}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\,dx$ and asked what happens to the limits under substitution.
The two-layer plan — trig substitution $x = \sin\theta$ (limits $0 \to \pi/2$), then $w = \cos\theta$ (limits $1 \to 0$) — produced a clean $\tfrac{2}{3}$. The key lesson is that mixed problems reward an up-front plan: declare each layer, change limits each time, and resist the urge to do algebra before stating the strategy.
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence — that tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
Q1. Use the substitution $u = 1 + x^2$ to evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} \frac{x^3}{1 + x^2}\,dx$. (3 marks)
Q2. Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi/4} \sec^2 x \tan x\,dx$ in two ways: (a) substitution $u = \tan x$; (b) substitution $u = \sec x$. Confirm both give the same exact value. (3 marks)
Q3. Evaluate $\displaystyle\int_0^{1} x^2 e^{-x}\,dx$ using integration by parts twice. Leave the answer in exact form. (4 marks)
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
Activity answers:
1. $\sin^3\theta\cos^2\theta = \sin\theta(1-\cos^2\theta)\cos^2\theta$. Sub $u = \cos\theta$, $du = -\sin\theta\,d\theta$, limits $1 \to 0$. Integral $= \int_0^1 (1-u^2)u^2\,du = \int_0^1 (u^2 - u^4)\,du = \tfrac{1}{3} - \tfrac{1}{5} = \tfrac{2}{15}$.
2. $u = e^x$, $du = e^x\,dx$, limits $1 \to 2$. Integral $= \int_1^2 \dfrac{du}{u^2+4} = \tfrac{1}{2}[\arctan(u/2)]_1^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}[\arctan 1 - \arctan(1/2)] = \tfrac{\pi}{8} - \tfrac{1}{2}\arctan(1/2)$.
3. IBP: $f = \ln x$, $dg = x\,dx \Rightarrow df = dx/x$, $g = x^2/2$. $\int x\ln x\,dx = \tfrac{x^2}{2}\ln x - \int \tfrac{x}{2}\,dx = \tfrac{x^2}{2}\ln x - \tfrac{x^2}{4}$. Evaluate $1 \to e$: $\left(\tfrac{e^2}{2} - \tfrac{e^2}{4}\right) - \left(0 - \tfrac{1}{4}\right) = \tfrac{e^2}{4} + \tfrac{1}{4} = \tfrac{e^2 + 1}{4}$.
4. $x = \tfrac{1}{2}(2x + 4) - 2$. Split: $\int_0^1 \dfrac{x}{x^2+4x+5}\,dx = \tfrac{1}{2}[\ln(x^2+4x+5)]_0^1 - 2\int_0^1 \dfrac{dx}{(x+2)^2 + 1} = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln\!\left(\tfrac{10}{5}\right) - 2[\arctan(x+2)]_0^1 = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln 2 - 2(\arctan 3 - \arctan 2)$.
5. $f = \arctan x$, $dg = dx \Rightarrow df = dx/(1+x^2)$, $g = x$. $\int_0^1 \arctan x\,dx = [x\arctan x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \dfrac{x}{1+x^2}\,dx = \tfrac{\pi}{4} - \tfrac{1}{2}\ln 2$.
Q1 (3 marks): $u = 1+x^2$, $du = 2x\,dx$, $x^2 = u-1$, limits $1 \to 2$ [1]. $\int_0^1 \dfrac{x^3}{1+x^2}\,dx = \tfrac{1}{2}\int_1^2 \dfrac{u-1}{u}\,du = \tfrac{1}{2}\int_1^2 (1 - 1/u)\,du$ [1]. $= \tfrac{1}{2}[u - \ln u]_1^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(1 - \ln 2) = \tfrac{1 - \ln 2}{2}$ [1].
Q2 (3 marks): (a) $u = \tan x$, $du = \sec^2 x\,dx$, limits $0 \to 1$. $\int_0^1 u\,du = \tfrac{1}{2}$ [1]. (b) $u = \sec x$, $du = \sec x \tan x\,dx$, so $\sec^2 x \tan x\,dx = u\,du$, limits $1 \to \sqrt{2}$. $\int_1^{\sqrt 2} u\,du = \tfrac{1}{2}(2 - 1) = \tfrac{1}{2}$ [1]. Both equal $\tfrac{1}{2}$ — consistent (the two antiderivatives differ by a constant) [1].
Q3 (4 marks): Let $I = \int_0^1 x^2 e^{-x}\,dx$. IBP with $f = x^2$, $dg = e^{-x}\,dx \Rightarrow df = 2x\,dx$, $g = -e^{-x}$. $I = [-x^2 e^{-x}]_0^1 + 2\int_0^1 x e^{-x}\,dx = -e^{-1} + 2J$ [1]. IBP on $J = \int_0^1 x e^{-x}\,dx$ with $f = x$, $dg = e^{-x}\,dx$. $J = [-xe^{-x}]_0^1 + \int_0^1 e^{-x}\,dx = -e^{-1} + (1 - e^{-1}) = 1 - 2e^{-1}$ [1]. So $I = -e^{-1} + 2(1 - 2e^{-1}) = 2 - 5e^{-1} = 2 - \tfrac{5}{e}$ [1]. Final exact form: $\boxed{2 - \tfrac{5}{e}}$ [1].
Five timed questions combining substitution, by parts, partial fractions and limit handling. Beat the boss to bank a tier — gold (90% + speed), silver (75%), or bronze (50%). Replays welcome.
⚔ Enter the arenaClimb platforms by answering quick integration questions. Lighter alternative to the boss.
Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review.