Equation of a Line — Parametric & Cartesian
The vector equation $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ is one line written three ways. Splitting it component-by-component gives the parametric form; eliminating $\lambda$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form. Each form is best for a different question type — and being able to convert between them is the core skill of MEX-V1 line problems.
From Lesson 05 you know $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$. If $\mathbf{r} = \langle x, y, z \rangle$, $\mathbf{a} = \langle 2, -1, 4 \rangle$ and $\mathbf{b} = \langle 1, 3, -2 \rangle$, write three scalar equations by matching components. Sketch your reasoning below.
Vector $\to$ parametric: read off components. Parametric $\to$ Cartesian: solve each scalar equation for $\lambda$ and equate. Going backwards (Cartesian $\to$ parametric $\to$ vector) is the reverse: set the common ratio equal to $\lambda$, then read off $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$.
The three-form ladder: vector $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ at the top, parametric in the middle, Cartesian at the bottom. Each step removes (or restores) the parameter $\lambda$.
Parametric: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$.
Cartesian (all $b_i \neq 0$): $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$.
Key facts
- Parametric form: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$
- Cartesian (symmetric) form: $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$
- Cartesian form requires every $b_i \neq 0$
- If $b_i = 0$: that coordinate is fixed at $a_i$
Concepts
- Why parametric form is just the vector equation read component-wise
- Why eliminating $\lambda$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form
- How to recover $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ from a Cartesian equation
Skills
- Convert vector $\to$ parametric $\to$ Cartesian and back
- Handle the edge case where a direction component is zero
- Test whether a point lies on a line using any of the three forms
Starting from $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ with $\mathbf{r} = \langle x, y, z \rangle$, $\mathbf{a} = \langle a_1, a_2, a_3 \rangle$, $\mathbf{b} = \langle b_1, b_2, b_3 \rangle$, matching components gives the parametric form:
If every $b_i \neq 0$, solve each equation for $\lambda$: $\lambda = \dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$. Dropping the $\lambda =$ gives the symmetric Cartesian form:
Worked through the hook with $\mathbf{a} = \langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle$, $\mathbf{b} = \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$:
- Parametric: $x = 1 + 3\lambda$, $y = 2 - \lambda$, $z = -1 + 2\lambda$.
- Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-1}{3} = \dfrac{y-2}{-1} = \dfrac{z+1}{2}$.
Degenerate case. If, say, $\mathbf{b} = \langle 0, 2, 5 \rangle$, then $x$ is constant ($x = a_1$) and the Cartesian form becomes $x = a_1$, $\dfrac{y - a_2}{2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{5}$.
Parametric: $x = a_1 + \lambda b_1$, $y = a_2 + \lambda b_2$, $z = a_3 + \lambda b_3$ · Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$ (only when every $b_i \neq 0$) · $b_i = 0$ $\Rightarrow$ replace that fraction with $x_i = a_i$ · Each fraction equals $\lambda$ — that is why they are all equal
Pause — copy the parametric form ($x=a_1+\lambda b_1$ etc.), the Cartesian symmetric form, the rule for $b_i=0$ (write $x_i=a_i$ instead of a fraction), and the fact that each fraction equals $\lambda$ into your book.
Quick check: The line $\mathbf{r} = \langle 2, -3, 5 \rangle + \lambda \langle 4, 1, -2 \rangle$ in symmetric Cartesian form is:
We just saw the chain vector → parametric → Cartesian: set $x = a_1+\lambda b_1$, $y = a_2+\lambda b_2$, $z = a_3+\lambda b_3$, then eliminate $\lambda$ to get $(x-a_1)/b_1 = (y-a_2)/b_2 = (z-a_3)/b_3$ (when no $b_i = 0$). That raises a question: how do we reverse the process — reading a point and direction off a Cartesian equation? This card answers it → $\frac{x-p}{u} = \frac{y-q}{v} = \frac{z-r}{w}$ gives point $(p,q,r)$ and direction $\langle u,v,w\rangle$; watch the sign.
Given a symmetric Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x - p}{u} = \dfrac{y - q}{v} = \dfrac{z - r}{w}$, the line passes through $(p, q, r)$ in direction $\langle u, v, w \rangle$. So the equivalent vector form is:
Reading carefully: the numerators give $\mathbf{a}$ (after flipping signs as needed: $x - p$ means $p$, not $-p$). The denominators give $\mathbf{b}$.
Degenerate Cartesian form. If the Cartesian appears as "$x = a_1$, $\dfrac{y - a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{b_3}$" then $b_1 = 0$ and the line is parallel to the $yz$-plane (its $x$-coordinate never changes). The vector form is $\mathbf{r} = \langle a_1, a_2, a_3 \rangle + \lambda \langle 0, b_2, b_3 \rangle$.
Point-on-line via Cartesian. A point $(x_0, y_0, z_0)$ lies on $\dfrac{x-a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y-a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z-a_3}{b_3}$ iff all three fractions evaluate to the same number. This is often quicker than solving the parametric system.
Cartesian $\dfrac{x-p}{u} = \dfrac{y-q}{v} = \dfrac{z-r}{w}$ $\Rightarrow$ point $(p,q,r)$, direction $\langle u, v, w \rangle$ · Watch sign: $x + 3 = x - (-3)$ so $p = -3$ · If one denominator is zero, that coordinate is constant (write it as $x_i = a_i$) · Point on line test: evaluate all three fractions; equal $\Rightarrow$ on the line
Pause — copy the Cartesian → vector reading rule (denominators = direction, constants after $-$ = point), the sign trap ($x+3 \Rightarrow p=-3$), and the point-on-line test (all three fractions equal) into your book.
Did you get this? True or false: the line with Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+1}{2} = \dfrac{y-3}{-1} = \dfrac{z+4}{5}$ passes through the point $(-1, 3, -4)$ with direction $\langle 2, -1, 5 \rangle$.
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
A line has vector equation $\mathbf{r} = \langle 4, -2, 1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, 5, -1 \rangle$. Write the parametric form, then convert to symmetric Cartesian form.
A line has Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+2}{4} = \dfrac{y-1}{-3} = \dfrac{z}{2}$. Write a vector equation of the line and find the point at $\lambda = 1$.
Write parametric and Cartesian equations for the line through $A(3, -1, 4)$ with direction $\mathbf{b} = \langle 0, 2, -5 \rangle$.
Fill the gap: The symmetric Cartesian form of the line $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda\mathbf{b}$ is $\dfrac{x - a_1}{b_1} = \dfrac{y - a_2}{b_2} = \dfrac{z - a_3}{b_3}$, valid only when every is .
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Did you get this? True or false: the Cartesian equation of the line through $(2, 5, -1)$ with direction $\langle 3, 0, 4 \rangle$ may be written $\dfrac{x-2}{3} = \dfrac{y-5}{0} = \dfrac{z+1}{4}$.
Activities · practice with the ideas
Convert $\mathbf{r} = \langle 0, 3, -2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 1, -4, 2 \rangle$ to (a) parametric and (b) symmetric Cartesian form.
A line is given by $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y+3}{4} = \dfrac{z}{-1}$. Write a vector equation and find the point at $\lambda = 3$.
Write the parametric and Cartesian forms of the line through $(2, 5, -3)$ with direction $\langle 0, 1, 4 \rangle$. Why is the standard symmetric form not usable in full?
Show that $P(7, -8, 5)$ lies on the line $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y+2}{-2} = \dfrac{z-2}{1}$.
A line passes through $A(1, 0, 2)$ and $B(3, 4, -1)$. Write a vector equation, then the parametric and Cartesian forms.
Odd one out: Three of these correctly describe the line $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 2, 3 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, -1, 4 \rangle$. Which one does NOT?
Earlier you converted $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ to parametric and Cartesian forms and asked what changes when a direction component is zero.
The parametric form is $x = 1 + 3\lambda$, $y = 2 - \lambda$, $z = -1 + 2\lambda$; the Cartesian form is $\dfrac{x-1}{3} = \dfrac{y-2}{-1} = \dfrac{z+1}{2}$. If any $b_i$ were zero, you'd have had to split that coordinate off as a constant. The crucial insight is that all three forms describe the same line — they just emphasise different aspects (parameter, components, ratios). Choose the form that best fits the question.
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence — that tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
Q1. Convert $\mathbf{r} = \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 1, 4, -2 \rangle$ to parametric and symmetric Cartesian form. (2 marks)
Q2. A line has Cartesian equation $\dfrac{x+2}{3} = \dfrac{y-4}{-1} = \dfrac{z-1}{2}$. Write a vector equation, and show that the point $P(7, -1, 7)$ lies on the line. (3 marks)
Q3. The line $\ell$ passes through $A(2, 3, -1)$ with direction $\mathbf{d} = \langle 0, 4, -2 \rangle$. Write parametric equations for $\ell$, then explain why the standard symmetric Cartesian form must be modified, and write the modified form. (3 marks)
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
Activity answers:
1. (a) $x = \lambda$, $y = 3 - 4\lambda$, $z = -2 + 2\lambda$. (b) $\dfrac{x}{1} = \dfrac{y - 3}{-4} = \dfrac{z + 2}{2}$ (or equivalently $x = \dfrac{y-3}{-4} = \dfrac{z+2}{2}$).
2. Point $(1, -3, 0)$, direction $\langle 2, 4, -1 \rangle$. $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, -3, 0 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, 4, -1 \rangle$. At $\lambda = 3$: $\mathbf{r} = \langle 7, 9, -3 \rangle$.
3. Parametric: $x = 2$, $y = 5 + \lambda$, $z = -3 + 4\lambda$. Cartesian: $x = 2$, $\dfrac{y - 5}{1} = \dfrac{z + 3}{4}$. The fraction $\dfrac{x - 2}{0}$ is undefined, so $x = 2$ must be stated separately.
4. Substitute: $(7 - 1)/2 = 3$; $(-8 + 2)/(-2) = 3$; $(5 - 2)/1 = 3$. All three equal $3$, so $P$ lies on the line (at $\lambda = 3$).
5. $\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{B} - \mathbf{A} = \langle 2, 4, -3 \rangle$. Vector: $\mathbf{r} = \langle 1, 0, 2 \rangle + \lambda \langle 2, 4, -3 \rangle$. Parametric: $x = 1 + 2\lambda$, $y = 4\lambda$, $z = 2 - 3\lambda$. Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-1}{2} = \dfrac{y}{4} = \dfrac{z-2}{-3}$.
Q1 (2 marks): Parametric: $x = 3 + \lambda$, $y = -1 + 4\lambda$, $z = 2 - 2\lambda$ [1]. Cartesian: $\dfrac{x-3}{1} = \dfrac{y+1}{4} = \dfrac{z-2}{-2}$ [1].
Q2 (3 marks): Point $(-2, 4, 1)$, direction $\langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ $\Rightarrow$ $\mathbf{r} = \langle -2, 4, 1 \rangle + \lambda \langle 3, -1, 2 \rangle$ [1]. Test $P(7, -1, 7)$: $\dfrac{7+2}{3} = 3$; $\dfrac{-1-4}{-1} = 5$ — these are not equal, so $P$ does NOT lie on the line. (Marking note: if instead $P = (7, 1, 7)$: $\dfrac{9}{3} = 3$, $\dfrac{-3}{-1} = 3$, $\dfrac{6}{2} = 3$ ✓.) Award marks for correct vector form [1] and a correct, well-justified point-on-line test [1]. (NESA MEX-V1.)
Q3 (3 marks): Parametric: $x = 2$, $y = 3 + 4\lambda$, $z = -1 - 2\lambda$ [1]. Because $d_1 = 0$, the fraction $\dfrac{x-2}{0}$ is undefined, so the standard symmetric form fails [1]. Modified Cartesian: $x = 2$, $\dfrac{y-3}{4} = \dfrac{z+1}{-2}$ [1].
Five timed questions on converting between vector, parametric and symmetric Cartesian forms — including degenerate cases. Beat the boss to bank a tier — gold (90% + speed), silver (75%), or bronze (50%). Replays welcome.
⚔ Enter the arenaClimb platforms by answering quick form-conversion questions. Lighter alternative to the boss.
Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review.