Skip to content
M
hscscience Ext 1 · Y12
0/100daily goal
0
0
0 due
0
L1 · 0 XP
KJ
Your weak spots
Insights load after your first practice round.
Module 5 · L11 of 20 ~40 min ⚡ +90 XP available

Induction for Inequalities I

Is $2^n$ always bigger than $n$? Intuitively yes — but can you prove it for every positive integer at once? Mathematical induction turns that intuition into an airtight argument. In this lesson you'll master the three-step inequality structure, learn the key “bridge the gap” technique, and prove results like $2^n > n$ and $n! > 2^{n-1}$ from scratch.

Today's hook — Without calculating, do you believe $2^n > n$ for every positive integer $n$? What about $n = 100$? What about $n = 1{,}000{,}000$? Jot your reasoning now. You'll return to it after card 06.
0/5QUESTS
01
Recall — your gut answer first
+5 XP warm-up

Without calculating, do you believe $2^n > n$ for every positive integer $n$? Try $n = 1, 2, 3, 4$ by hand. What pattern do you notice? Does the gap between $2^n$ and $n$ grow or shrink as $n$ increases?

auto-saved
02
The three-step structure for inequalities
+5 XP to read

Inequality proofs by induction follow the same three steps as all induction proofs, but the inductive step requires careful algebraic manipulation:

Step 1 — Base Case: Verify the inequality for the smallest relevant $n$. Sometimes that is $n = 1$; sometimes it is $n = 2$ or $n = 3$. Always check where the pattern actually starts.

Step 2 — Inductive Hypothesis: Assume the inequality holds for $n = k$. Write this clearly, e.g. "Assume $2^k > k$ for some positive integer $k$."

Step 3 — Inductive Step: Start with the LHS for $n = k + 1$. Apply an algebraic manipulation that introduces the hypothesis. Then show the result exceeds the RHS for $n = k + 1$.

STEP 1 · BASE CASE Verify for smallest n (e.g. n=1) STEP 2 · HYPOTHESIS Assume true for n = k STEP 3 · INDUCTIVE STEP Start LHS for k+1, use hyp, bridge to RHS for k+1
$P(k) \Rightarrow P(k+1)$
Start from the LHS
Always begin the inductive step with the expression for $n = k+1$ on the LHS, then manipulate down to show it exceeds the RHS. Never start from the conclusion.
Bridge the gap
After using the hypothesis you often get an intermediate expression that is “close but not equal” to the target. Prove an auxiliary inequality to close the argument.
Check base case first
Some inequalities only hold for $n \geq n_0$. Always verify where the pattern starts — and state it clearly in your proof.
03
What you'll master
Know

Key facts

  • The three steps of an inequality induction proof
  • $2^n > n$ for all $n \geq 1$
  • $n! > 2^{n-1}$ for all $n \geq 3$
  • Factorial growth dominates exponential growth for large $n$
Understand

Concepts

  • Why you must derive $P(k+1)$ from $P(k)$, not assume it
  • The role of auxiliary inequalities in “bridging the gap”
  • Why the base case must be chosen carefully for inequalities
Can do

Skills

  • Write a complete, rigorous inequality induction proof
  • Identify and prove the auxiliary inequality in the inductive step
  • Determine the correct base case for a given inequality
04
Key terms
Inductive hypothesisThe assumption that $P(k)$ is true for some specific integer $k$. It is what you are allowed to use in the inductive step.
Inductive stepThe logical argument showing $P(k) \Rightarrow P(k+1)$. For inequalities, this involves manipulating the LHS for $k+1$ using the hypothesis.
Auxiliary inequalityA secondary inequality needed to “bridge the gap” between the hypothesis-substituted expression and the required target. Must be proved separately.
Base caseThe specific value of $n$ (often $n=1$) for which you verify the inequality directly by substitution. Sets the chain of induction in motion.
Strict inequality ($>$)A relationship where one side is strictly greater than the other, with no equality. Compare with $\geq$ (greater than or equal to).
Factorial $n!$$n! = n \times (n-1) \times \cdots \times 2 \times 1$. Grows faster than any exponential $a^n$ for sufficiently large $n$.
05
The inequality proof technique
core concept

The key to inequality induction is a two-part move in the inductive step:

  1. Substitute the hypothesis. Write the LHS for $n = k+1$, then replace a sub-expression using the inductive hypothesis $P(k)$ to introduce an inequality sign.
  2. Bridge the gap. After substitution you have an intermediate expression. Show that this intermediate expression still satisfies the required inequality by proving a short auxiliary result.
$$\text{LHS}_{k+1} \;\xrightarrow{\text{step 1 (use hyp.)}} \; \text{intermediate} \;\xrightarrow{\text{step 2 (auxiliary)}} \; \text{RHS}_{k+1}$$

The intermediate expression is between the LHS and the target RHS. The auxiliary inequality must be proved from scratch — you cannot just say “this is obvious.”

Common error. Students often write $2^{k+1} = 2 \times 2^k > 2k \geq k+1$ without justifying $2k \geq k+1$. The justification is $2k - (k+1) = k - 1 \geq 0$ for all $k \geq 1$ — a two-line auxiliary argument that must appear in your working.

The key to inequality induction is a two-part move in the inductive step:

Pause — copy the two-part inequality induction move: (1) apply hypothesis, (2) show the residual maintains the inequality for $k+1$ into your book.

Quick check: In the inductive step for an inequality proof, after applying the inductive hypothesis you obtain an expression that is not yet equal to the required RHS. What must you do next?

PROBLEM 1 · EXPONENTIAL VS LINEAR

Prove by mathematical induction that $2^n > n$ for all positive integers $n$.

1
Base Case ($n = 1$): LHS $= 2^1 = 2$, RHS $= 1$. Since $2 > 1$, true for $n = 1$.
Verify the smallest case directly by substitution. The inequality holds here, so the chain can start.
PROBLEM 2 · FACTORIAL VS EXPONENTIAL

Prove by mathematical induction that $n! > 2^{n-1}$ for all integers $n \geq 3$.

1
Base Case ($n = 3$): LHS $= 3! = 6$, RHS $= 2^{2} = 4$. Since $6 > 4$, true for $n = 3$.
The statement specifies $n \geq 3$, so test $n = 3$. (Check: for $n = 1$, $1! = 1 > 2^0 = 1$ fails; for $n=2$, $2!=2 > 2^1=2$ also fails — hence base case at $n=3$.)

Did you get this? True or false: in the proof that $2^n > n$, the auxiliary inequality needed is $2k \geq k + 1$, which holds for all $k \geq 1$.

08
Key concepts summary
core concept

We just saw that the two-part inequality induction move applies the hypothesis to one side, then shows the residual term preserves the inequality for $n=k+1$. That raises a question: what formulas, templates, and conclusion wording should you have memorised before tackling these proofs independently? This card answers it → the core inequality templates and HSC conclusion phrasing.

  • Start from the stronger side: Begin with the LHS for $n = k+1$ and use the hypothesis to introduce an inequality.
  • Bridge the gap: After substitution, prove an auxiliary inequality to close the argument. Show $k - 1 \geq 0$ explicitly; do not say “obvious.”
  • Base case choice: Some inequalities only hold for $n \geq n_0$; always check where the pattern begins and state it.
  • Factorial growth: $n!$ grows faster than any exponential $a^n$ for large $n$, making factorial inequalities powerful and common in HSC.

Key concept: Key concepts summary.

Pause — copy the key inequality induction templates and the required conclusion wording into your book.

Fill the gap: To complete the inductive step in the proof of $2^n > n$, after writing $2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2k$, you must show that $2k \geq k + $ .

Trap 01
Assuming $P(k+1)$ directly
You cannot assume the inequality you are trying to prove. Assuming $2^{k+1} > k+1$ to prove $2^{k+1} > k+1$ is circular. Always derive $P(k+1)$ from $P(k)$ — that is the entire point of the inductive step.
Trap 02
Weak auxiliary arguments
Writing "$2k \geq k+1$ is obvious" scores 0 in HSC. You must show it: $2k - (k+1) = k-1 \geq 0$ for $k \geq 1$. Two lines. Always justify the auxiliary inequality explicitly.
Trap 03
Wrong base case
Inequalities often fail for small $n$. For $n! > 2^{n-1}$, the statement is false for $n = 1$ ($1! = 1 \not> 1 = 2^0$). Always verify the smallest $n$ for which the statement holds, and use that as your base case.

Did you get this? True or false: for the statement $n! > 2^{n-1}$, the correct base case is $n = 1$.

Work mode · how are you completing this lesson?
1

Verify the base case ($n = 1$) for $2^n > n$, showing your working clearly.

2

Write out the inductive hypothesis and the statement to be proved (i.e. $P(k+1)$) for the inequality $2^n > n$.

3

Prove the auxiliary inequality $2k \geq k+1$ for all positive integers $k$.

4

Identify the correct base case for the statement $3^n > n^2$. Is it $n=1$, $n=2$, or $n=3$? Verify by substitution.

5

Prove by induction that $3^n > n^2$ for all $n \geq 1$. (Hint: you will need to show $3k^2 \geq (k+1)^2$ as the auxiliary.)

Odd one out: Three of these statements about inequality induction are correct. Which one is NOT?

10
Revisit your thinking

Earlier you considered whether $2^n > n$ for large $n$ like $n = 1{,}000{,}000$.

The induction proof you just studied guarantees this for every positive integer — not just the ones you can check by hand. The key insight: each step only needs to prove $P(k) \Rightarrow P(k+1)$. Because we verified the base case and the chain of implication is unbroken, the truth extends forever. Even for $n = 10^{100}$.

auto-saved
01
Multiple choice
+5 XP per correct · +25 XP all-correct

Pick your answer, then rate your confidence — that tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.

02
Short answer
ApplyBand 32 marks

Q1. Prove the auxiliary inequality $2k \geq k + 1$ for all positive integers $k$. (2 marks)

auto-saved
ApplyBand 43 marks

Q2. Prove by mathematical induction that $2^n > n$ for all positive integers $n$. (3 marks)

auto-saved
AnalyseBand 53 marks

Q3. Prove by mathematical induction that $n! > 2^{n-1}$ for all integers $n \geq 3$. (3 marks)

auto-saved
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)

Activity answers:

1. LHS $= 2^1 = 2$, RHS $= 1$; $2 > 1$ ✓

2. Hypothesis: assume $2^k > k$. To prove: $2^{k+1} > k+1$.

3. $2k - (k+1) = k - 1 \geq 0$ for $k \geq 1$. Therefore $2k \geq k+1$.

4. Test $n=1$: $3 > 1$ ✓. Base case is $n = 1$.

5. Base case $n=1$: $3^1=3>1=1^2$ ✓. Hypothesis: $3^k>k^2$. Step: $3^{k+1}=3\cdot3^k>3k^2$. Auxiliary: $3k^2\geq(k+1)^2 \Leftrightarrow 3k^2-k^2-2k-1=2k^2-2k-1\geq0$ for $k\geq2$ ✓.

Q1 (2 marks): $2k - (k+1) = k-1 \geq 0$ for all $k \geq 1$ [1]. Therefore $2k \geq k+1$ for all positive integers $k$ [1].

Q2 (3 marks): Base: $n=1$: $2^1=2>1$ ✓ [1]. Hyp: assume $2^k>k$. Step: $2^{k+1}=2\cdot2^k>2k\geq k+1$ (since $k\geq1$), so $2^{k+1}>k+1$ [2]. Conclude by induction [1 across steps].

Q3 (3 marks): Base: $n=3$: $6>4$ ✓ [1]. Hyp: assume $k!>2^{k-1}$. Step: $(k+1)!=(k+1)\cdot k!>(k+1)\cdot2^{k-1}>2\cdot2^{k-1}=2^k$ (since $k+1\geq4>2$) [2]. By induction, true for all $n\geq3$ [1 across steps].

01
Boss battle · The Inequality Inquisitor
earn bronze · silver · gold

Five timed questions. Beat the boss to bank a tier — gold (90% + speed), silver (75%), or bronze (50%). Replays welcome.

⚔ Enter the arena
02
Science Jump · platform challenge

Climb platforms by answering inequality induction questions. Lighter alternative to the boss.

Mark lesson as complete

Tick when you've finished the practice and review.

🎓
Want help with Induction for Inequalities I?

Work through this topic 1-on-1 with an experienced HSC tutor.

Book a free session →