Absolute Value Inequalities
GPS devices calculate your distance from a target location. Quality control systems specify that a measurement must be within 0.5 mm of a target — that's an absolute value inequality. Navigation, engineering tolerances, signal processing: all rely on expressing "within a certain distance" algebraically. In this lesson you'll master two powerful techniques — case analysis and the squaring method — to handle any absolute value inequality that appears in the HSC.
What does $|x| < 3$ mean in words? Without using algebra — what values of $x$ do you think satisfy this inequality? Sketch the number line in your head.
There are only two methods for absolute value inequalities. Case analysis splits into cases based on the sign of the expression inside the bars. Squaring is faster when both sides are non-negative. Know when to use each.
Absolute value means distance from zero. So $|x| < a$ asks "what values are closer than $a$ to zero?" — those are precisely the values between $-a$ and $a$. And $|x| > a$ asks "what values are further than $a$ from zero?" — that gives two separate rays: $x < -a$ or $x > a$.
Key facts
- $|x| < a \Leftrightarrow -a < x < a$ (for $a > 0$)
- $|x| > a \Leftrightarrow x < -a$ or $x > a$ (for $a > 0$)
- Squaring both sides is valid when both sides are non-negative
Concepts
- The geometric interpretation of absolute value as distance from zero
- Why $|x| < a$ produces one interval but $|x| > a$ produces two intervals
- When squaring is valid and when case analysis is needed instead
Skills
- Apply the fundamental rules directly to simple absolute value inequalities
- Solve complex cases using case analysis with two cases
- Solve $|A| < |B|$ type problems by squaring both sides
For $a > 0$, these two rules are the foundation of everything:
These rules come directly from the definition of absolute value as distance from zero.
- $|x| < a$ means "$x$ is within distance $a$ of zero" — i.e., $x$ lies between $-a$ and $a$: a single interval.
- $|x| > a$ means "$x$ is more than distance $a$ from zero" — i.e., $x$ lies to the left of $-a$ or to the right of $a$: two separate intervals.
The same rules apply when $x$ is replaced by any expression, e.g. $|2x - 1| < 5$ becomes $-5 < 2x - 1 < 5$.
|x| < a -a < x < a — one interval (between -a and a); |x| > a x < -a or x > a — two intervals (union of two rays)
Pause — copy both fundamental absolute value rules into your book: $|x| < a \Leftrightarrow -a < x < a$ (one interval); $|x| > a \Leftrightarrow x < -a$ or $x > a$ (two separate rays).
Quick check: Which of the following correctly solves $|x| > 5$?
We just saw that $|x| < a Leftrightarrow -a < x < a$ and $|x| > a Leftrightarrow x < -a$ or $x > a$. That raises a question: when the expression inside the modulus contains $x$ (like $|2x-3| le 5$), which algebraic technique resolves the absolute value without guessing the sign? This card answers it → case analysis (split on whether the inner expression is $ge 0$ or $< 0$) and squaring both sides (valid when both sides are non-negative).
Method 1: Case Analysis
For expressions like $|2x - 1| > 5$, use two cases based on the sign of the expression inside the bars:
- Case 1: $2x - 1 \ge 0$ (so $|2x - 1| = 2x - 1$). Solve $2x - 1 > 5$, giving $x > 3$. Combined with $x \ge \tfrac{1}{2}$: solution from this case is $x > 3$.
- Case 2: $2x - 1 < 0$ (so $|2x - 1| = -(2x - 1) = 1 - 2x$). Solve $1 - 2x > 5$, giving $x < -2$. Combined with $x < \tfrac{1}{2}$: solution from this case is $x < -2$.
- Final solution: Union of both cases: $x < -2$ or $x > 3$.
Method 2: Squaring Both Sides
When both sides of the inequality are non-negative, we can square both sides without changing the inequality direction. This is particularly useful for inequalities like $|x - 3| < |x + 1|$:
- Square both sides: $(x - 3)^2 < (x + 1)^2$
- Expand: $x^2 - 6x + 9 < x^2 + 2x + 1$
- Simplify: $-6x + 9 < 2x + 1 \Rightarrow 8 < 8x \Rightarrow x > 1$
Case analysis: Case 1 — expression inside 0, so || = (); Case 2 — expression inside < 0, so || = -(); Always intersect each case's solution with the condition used in that case
Pause — copy the case-analysis method into your book: Case 1 (expression $\ge 0$): remove modulus sign directly; Case 2 (expression $< 0$): negate; always intersect each case's solution with the condition defining that case.
Did you get this? True or false: we can always square both sides of an absolute value inequality, regardless of what is on each side.
Worked examples · 3 in a row, reveal as you go
Solve: $|3x + 2| \le 7$
Solve: $|x - 2| > |2x + 1|$
Solve: $|2x - 1| > 5$ using case analysis
Fill the gap: The inequality $|2x - 3| \le 5$ is equivalent to $-5 \le 2x - 3 \le 5$, which simplifies to $-1 \le x \le$ .
Misconceptions to fix · the 3 traps that cost marks
Did you get this? True or false: $|x - 4| < 2$ is equivalent to $2 < x < 6$.
Activities · practice with the ideas
Solve $|2x - 3| \le 5$ using the direct rule. Express your answer as a compound inequality and in interval notation.
Solve $|x + 1| > |x - 3|$ using the squaring method. Show all expansion and simplification steps.
Find all values of $x$ for which $|x - 4| < 2$ AND $x^2 - 5x + 6 \le 0$. Solve each inequality separately, then find the intersection.
Solve $|3x - 6| \ge 9$ using the direct rule. Your answer should be a union of two intervals.
Explain geometrically why $|x - a| < r$ represents all points within distance $r$ of the point $a$ on the number line.
Earlier you were asked: what does $|x| < 3$ mean in words, and what values satisfy it?
$|x| < 3$ means "$x$ is less than distance 3 from zero" — i.e., $x$ is between $-3$ and $3$. The values that satisfy it are precisely $-3 < x < 3$, which is the interval $(-3, 3)$.
The geometric insight: $|x|$ measures distance from zero. "Distance less than 3" means you're inside a region of radius 3 centred at 0. On a number line, that's a single segment from $-3$ to $3$.
By contrast, $|x| > 3$ means "distance greater than 3 from zero" — you're outside that region, giving two separate rays: $x < -3$ or $x > 3$.
Pick your answer, then rate your confidence — that tells the system what to drill next. Each retry pulls a fresh mix from the bank.
Q1. Solve $|2x - 3| \le 5$. Express your answer as a compound inequality and in interval notation. (2 marks)
Q2. Solve $|x + 1| > |x - 3|$ using the squaring method. Show all expansion and simplification steps clearly. (3 marks)
Q3. Find all values of $x$ satisfying both $|x - 4| < 2$ and $x^2 - 5x + 6 \le 0$ simultaneously. Show complete working for each inequality before finding the intersection. (3 marks)
Comprehensive answers (click to reveal)
Activity drills: 1. $-5 \le 2x-3 \le 5 \Rightarrow -2 \le 2x \le 8 \Rightarrow -1 \le x \le 4$. Interval: $[-1,4]$. · 2. Square: $(x+1)^2 > (x-3)^2 \Rightarrow x^2+2x+1 > x^2-6x+9 \Rightarrow 8x > 8 \Rightarrow x > 1$. · 3. $|x-4|<2 \Rightarrow 2<x<6$. $x^2-5x+6=(x-2)(x-3) \le 0 \Rightarrow 2 \le x \le 3$. Intersection: $2 < x \le 3$, i.e. $(2,3]$. · 4. $|3x-6| \ge 9 \Rightarrow 3x-6 \le -9$ or $3x-6 \ge 9 \Rightarrow x \le -1$ or $x \ge 5$. Interval: $(-\infty,-1] \cup [5,\infty)$. · 5. $|x-a|$ is the distance from $x$ to $a$ because distance = absolute difference. So $|x-a| < r$ means the distance from $x$ to $a$ is less than $r$ — all points within a circle of radius $r$ centred at $a$; on a number line, this is the interval $(a-r, a+r)$.
Q1 (2 marks): $|2x-3| \le 5 \Rightarrow -5 \le 2x-3 \le 5$ [1]. $\Rightarrow -2 \le 2x \le 8 \Rightarrow -1 \le x \le 4$. Interval: $[-1, 4]$ [1].
Q2 (3 marks): Square: $(x+1)^2 > (x-3)^2$ [1]. Expand: $x^2+2x+1 > x^2-6x+9$ [1]. Simplify: $8x > 8 \Rightarrow x > 1$ [1].
Q3 (3 marks): $|x-4| < 2 \Rightarrow -2 < x-4 < 2 \Rightarrow 2 < x < 6$ [1]. $x^2-5x+6=(x-2)(x-3) \le 0 \Rightarrow 2 \le x \le 3$ [1]. Intersection: $x$ in $(2,6)$ AND $x$ in $[2,3]$ = $x$ in $(2, 3]$ [1].
Five timed questions. Beat the boss to bank a tier — gold (90% + speed), silver (75%), or bronze (50%). Replays welcome.
⚔ Enter the arenaClimb platforms by answering absolute value inequality questions. Lighter alternative to the boss.
Mark lesson as complete
Tick when you've finished the practice and review.