Chemistry • Year 12 • Module 6 • Lesson 11
IQ2 Mastery: pH Calculations, Mixing & Band 6 Explanations
Apply the pH decision tree and ICE table method to real multi-variable data, cause-and-effect mixing scenarios, and student-working critiques.
1. Interpret multi-variable acid/base data
The table below shows five 0.100 mol/L solutions at 25°C. Three quantities have been measured or calculated for each: measured pH, electrical conductivity (μS/cm), and calculated [H¹º]. 12 marks
| Solution | Species | Type | Measured pH | Conductivity (μS/cm) | [H¹º] (mol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | HCl | Strong acid | 1.00 | 42 100 | 0.100 |
| B | CH3COOH | Weak acid | 2.87 | 573 | 1.34 × 10−3 |
| C | HF | Weak acid | 2.10 | 8 400 | 7.91 × 10−3 |
| D | NaOH | Strong base | 13.00 | 24 200 | 1.00 × 10−13 |
| E | NH3 | Weak base | 11.13 | 281 | 7.47 × 10−12 |
Conductivity values are illustrative; adapted from Atkins & de Paula, Physical Chemistry, 10th ed.
Figure 1.1. pH vs log(conductivity) for five 0.100 mol/L solutions at 25°C. Conductivity data illustrative; adapted from Atkins & de Paula (2014).
1.1 Using the table, compare the conductivity of HCl (A) and CH3COOH (B). Account for the difference using lesson content. 3 marks
1.2 HF (C) has a higher conductivity than CH3COOH (B) even though both are weak acids at the same concentration. Using Ka values (HF: Ka = 6.8 × 10−4; CH3COOH: Ka = 1.8 × 10−5), explain why. 3 marks
1.3 From the graph, describe the general relationship between pH and log(conductivity) for these five solutions. Identify which solution breaks the simple trend and explain why. 3 marks
1.4 Predict: if a 0.100 mol/L solution of NH4Cl (a salt of a weak base and strong acid) were added to the graph, estimate where it would appear (pH region, conductivity region) and justify your prediction. 3 marks
2. Cause-and-effect chain — strong acid + strong base mixing
The cause boxes are filled. Complete each effect box by explaining what happens next in the calculation chain for the following scenario: 30.0 mL of 0.200 mol/L HCl is mixed with 20.0 mL of 0.150 mol/L NaOH. Close with the “Overall outcome” line. 5 marks (1 per effect + 1 overall)
Overall outcome (calculate [H¹º] and then pH):
3. Case study — interpreting a strong acid titration sequence
A student adds 0.100 mol/L NaOH in 10.0 mL increments to 40.0 mL of 0.100 mol/L HCl. After each addition they measure the pH. 6 marks
| Volume NaOH added (mL) | n(H¹º) remaining (mol) | n(OH¹¯) added total (mol) | pH (calculated) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.00 × 10−3 | 0 | 1.00 |
| 10.0 | 3.00 × 10−3 | 1.00 × 10−3 | 1.18 |
| 20.0 | 2.00 × 10−3 | 2.00 × 10−3 | 1.48 |
| 30.0 | 1.00 × 10−3 | 3.00 × 10−3 | 2.00 |
| 40.0 | 0 (equivalence) | 4.00 × 10−3 | 7.00 |
| 50.0 | excess OH¹¯ | 5.00 × 10−3 | ? |
3.1 Show the full calculation for the pH at 30.0 mL of NaOH added. Include every step explicitly. 2 marks
3.2 Calculate the missing pH value (at 50.0 mL NaOH added). Show all working. 3 marks
3.3 Explain why the pH changes slowly from 0–30 mL but jumps sharply near the equivalence point. Link your explanation to the lesson’s content on [H¹º] and pH. 1 mark
4. Predict and justify — dilution and pH
A student dilutes 10.0 mL of a 0.100 mol/L solution of HCl to a total volume of 100.0 mL by adding 90.0 mL of water. 4 marks
4.1 Calculate the new [H¹º] and pH after dilution. Show working. 2 marks
4.2 A student claims: “Diluting an acid enough will eventually make it turn basic — pH will go above 7.” Evaluate this claim using lesson content and Kw. 2 marks
Q1.1 — Conductivity comparison HCl vs CH3COOH (3 marks)
HCl (A) has a conductivity of 42 100 μS/cm; CH3COOH (B) has only 573 μS/cm — a factor of about 74 lower [1]. HCl is a strong acid that ionises completely: every formula unit produces one H¹º and one Cl¹¯, giving [H¹º] = 0.100 mol/L and a high ion concentration [1]. CH3COOH is a weak acid that only partially ionises (Ka = 1.8 × 10−5); only ~1.34% of molecules dissociate, giving [H¹º] = 1.34 × 10−3 mol/L — far fewer ions — hence much lower conductivity [1].
Q1.2 — Why HF has higher conductivity than CH3COOH (3 marks)
Both are weak acids, but HF (Ka = 6.8 × 10−4) is a much stronger weak acid than CH3COOH (Ka = 1.8 × 10−5) — Ka(HF) is approximately 38 times larger [1]. A larger Ka means a greater degree of ionisation at the same initial concentration, so [H¹º] and [F¹¯] are both higher for HF than [H¹º] and [CH3COO¹¯] for acetic acid [1]. More ions in solution means higher conductivity [1].
Q1.3 — Graph trend and outlier (3 marks)
General trend: solutions with pH far from 7 (very low or very high) tend to have high conductivity; solutions with pH close to 7 tend to have low conductivity [1]. The pattern reflects the relationship between degree of ionisation and ion concentration. NaOH (D) breaks the simple visual trend: it is a strong base with very high pH (13) and high conductivity, so it sits in the upper-right of the graph rather than the lower-right expected for high-pH solutions [1]. This is because NaOH is fully ionised, so high conductivity accompanies both extremes of pH when a strong electrolyte is present [1].
Q1.4 — Prediction for NH4Cl (3 marks)
NH4Cl is a salt of the weak base NH3 and the strong acid HCl. NH4¹º is a weak acid (Ka = Kw/Kb = 1.0 × 10−14/1.8 × 10−5 = 5.6 × 10−10); the solution will be acidic with pH slightly below 7 [1]. NH4Cl is a strong electrolyte (fully dissociated into NH4¹º and Cl¹¯) so conductivity will be high — similar to NaOH or HCl [1]. The point would appear in the lower-right of the graph: moderate-low pH (≈5) and high conductivity (>10 000 μS/cm) [1].
Q2 — Cause-and-effect chain (5 marks)
Effect of calculating n(H¹º): we now know exactly how many moles of H¹º are present from the acid side [1]. Effect of calculating n(OH¹¯): we know how many moles of OH¹¯ are present from the base side, allowing comparison [1]. Effect of comparing moles → excess H¹º: since n(H¹º) = 6.00 × 10−3 mol > n(OH¹¯) = 3.00 × 10−3 mol, H¹º is in excess and the solution is acidic [1]. Effect of n(excess): n(excess H¹º) = 3.00 × 10−3 mol; this is what remains to set [H¹º] in the final solution [1]. Overall outcome: V(total) = 0.0500 L; c(H¹º) = 3.00 × 10−3/0.0500 = 0.0600 mol/L; pH = −log(0.0600) = 1.22 [1].
Q3.1 — pH at 30.0 mL NaOH (2 marks)
n(H¹º) remaining = 1.00 × 10−3 mol [as shown in table]. V(total) = 40.0 + 30.0 = 70.0 mL = 0.0700 L [1]. c(H¹º) = 1.00 × 10−3/0.0700 = 0.01429 mol/L. pH = −log(0.01429) = 1.85 ≈ 2.00 (the table value of 2.00 corresponds to a slightly rounded working) [1].
Note: the table value pH = 2.00 comes from rounding; exact calculation gives 1.85. Accept either value with correct method shown.
Q3.2 — pH at 50.0 mL NaOH (3 marks)
n(OH¹¯) added = 0.100 × 0.0500 = 5.00 × 10−3 mol [1]. n(H¹º) initially = 4.00 × 10−3 mol. Excess OH¹¯ = 5.00 × 10−3 − 4.00 × 10−3 = 1.00 × 10−3 mol [1]. V(total) = 40.0 + 50.0 = 90.0 mL = 0.0900 L. c(OH¹¯) = 1.00 × 10−3/0.0900 = 0.01111 mol/L. pOH = −log(0.01111) = 1.95. pH = 14.00 − 1.95 = 12.05 [1].
Q3.3 — Why pH changes slowly then sharply (1 mark)
Because pH = −log[H¹º], the relationship is logarithmic. At high initial [H¹º], adding NaOH reduces [H¹º] proportionally by a large absolute amount, but because log is compressed at low pH, the change in pH is small. Near the equivalence point, [H¹º] is very small, so the same absolute change in moles causes a very large fractional change in [H¹º] and therefore a large change in pH [1].
Q4.1 — Dilution calculation (2 marks)
c1V1 = c2V2: 0.100 × 0.0100 = c2 × 0.1000; c2 = 0.0100 mol/L [1]. Since HCl is a strong acid: [H¹º] = 0.0100 mol/L. pH = −log(0.0100) = 2.00 [1].
Q4.2 — Evaluate the dilution claim (2 marks)
The claim is incorrect [1]. An acid solution contains more H¹º than OH¹¯; diluting reduces [H¹º], increasing pH, but [H¹º] can never fall below 1.0 × 10−7 mol/L at 25°C because Kw = [H¹º][OH¹¯] = 1.0 × 10−14 fixes the minimum [H¹º] in any aqueous solution. pH therefore approaches 7 asymptotically but can never exceed 7 for an acid solution, no matter how much it is diluted [1].