Chemistry · Year 12 · Module 6 · Lesson 10
HSC Exam Practice
Enthalpy of Neutralisation: Comparing Strong & Weak
Short answer
1.Short answer
Define enthalpy of neutralisation and state the approximate value for a strong acid + strong base reaction.
Write the net ionic equation for the neutralisation of a strong acid by a strong base in aqueous solution. Explain why all strong acid + strong base neutralisations give the same ΔHn, regardless of which acid and base are used.
Explain why the enthalpy of neutralisation for CH3COOH(aq) + NaOH(aq) is less exothermic than for HCl(aq) + NaOH(aq) when equal volumes and concentrations are used.
A student measures ΔHn = −47.8 kJ/mol for an unknown acid X neutralised with NaOH. The theoretical strong acid baseline is −57.0 kJ/mol. Calculate the enthalpy of ionisation of acid X and state whether acid X is strong or weak, with justification.
Outline the ranking of ΔHn values from most exothermic to least exothermic for the following four combinations: (i) HCl + NaOH; (ii) HCl + NH3; (iii) CH3COOH + NaOH; (iv) CH3COOH + NH3. Provide one justification for the ranking of (ii) relative to (iii).
Describe how a calorimetry experiment could be designed to distinguish between a strong acid and a weak acid using 1.00 mol/L NaOH. State the controlled variables that must be kept the same and explain why each is necessary for a valid comparison.
Data response
2.Data response — calorimetry experiment at Orica’s sodium acetate facility
At Orica’s Kooragang Island facility (NSW), acetic acid (CH3COOH) is neutralised with sodium hydroxide to produce sodium acetate (CH3COONa). A process chemist performs a bench-scale calorimetry experiment to measure ΔHn. The graph below shows temperature versus time for both the CH3COOH + NaOH reaction and a reference HCl + NaOH experiment (same volumes and concentrations).
(a) Using the data from the graph, calculate ΔHn for each reaction. Show all working. Use m = 100.0 g and c = 4.18 J g−1 °C−1.
(b) Use your calculated ΔHn values to determine the enthalpy of ionisation of acetic acid. State the sign of this value and explain what it indicates about the bond-breaking process during ionisation.
(c) The Orica plant produces sodium acetate at a rate of 8000 mol h−1. Calculate the total heat released per hour during the acetic acid + NaOH neutralisation, using your ΔHn value from part (a). Express your answer in MJ h−1.
Extended response
3.Extended response
Evaluate the usefulness of enthalpy of neutralisation data as a tool for classifying an unknown acid as strong or weak, and for determining the acid’s Ka value. In your response, refer to the molecular-level mechanism for the enthalpy difference between strong and weak acid neutralisations, the limitations of foam cup calorimetry, and the role of pH measurement in complementing calorimetry data.
A student reads the following claim in an online resource: “When you neutralise any acid with sodium hydroxide, you always get the same amount of heat per mole, regardless of whether the acid is strong or weak, because neutralisation always forms one mole of water per mole of acid reacted.” Identify the scientific flaw in this claim and explain the correct chemistry.
Chemistry · Year 12 · Module 6 · Lesson 10
Answer Key & Marking Guidelines
Section 1 · Short answer · 2 marks · Band 3
Sample response. The enthalpy of neutralisation (ΔHn) is the heat change per mole of water formed when an acid and a base react to completion under standard conditions. For a strong acid + strong base reaction, ΔHn ≈ −57 kJ mol−1.
Marking notes. 1 mark for correctly defining ΔHn as heat per mole of water formed; 1 mark for stating −57 kJ/mol (accept −55 to −58 kJ/mol).
Section 1 · Short answer · 3 marks · Band 3–4
Sample response. Net ionic equation: H+(aq) + OH−(aq) → H2O(l). All strong acid + strong base combinations give the same ΔHn because both species are fully ionised before mixing, so the only reaction that occurs is the formation of water from pre-existing H+ and OH− ions. The spectator ions (e.g. Na+, Cl−) take no part in the reaction and contribute nothing to the enthalpy change.
Marking notes. 1 mark for the correct net ionic equation. 1 mark for identifying that both are fully ionised before mixing (no ionisation energy cost). 1 mark for stating spectator ions do not contribute to ΔH.
Section 1 · Short answer · 4 marks · Band 4
Sample response. Before mixing, HCl is completely ionised so H+ ions are freely available; CH3COOH is only partially ionised (Ka = 1.8 × 10−5, so <1% ionised at 1.00 mol/L). When OH− is added to the acetic acid solution, it drives the equilibrium CH3COOH ⇌ H+ + CH3COO− to the right, requiring the O–H bond in the carboxyl group to be broken. This ionisation is endothermic (ΔH(ionisation) ≈ +1.6 kJ/mol). By Hess’s Law, the net heat released = (energy from H+ + OH− → H2O) − (ionisation energy consumed) = −57 + 1.6 = −55.4 kJ/mol — less exothermic than HCl + NaOH.
Marking notes. 1 mark — HCl fully ionised, CH3COOH partially ionised before mixing. 1 mark — OH− drives equilibrium right during reaction, requiring O–H bond breaking. 1 mark — ionisation is endothermic. 1 mark — net ΔHn calculated correctly or stated as −55.4 kJ/mol (less negative than −57). All four points required for full marks.
Section 1 · Short answer · 3 marks · Band 4
Sample response. ΔH(ionisation of X) = ΔHn(X + NaOH) − ΔHn(strong acid + NaOH) = −47.8 − (−57.0) = +9.2 kJ/mol. Acid X is a weak acid: the measured ΔHn (−47.8 kJ/mol) is significantly more positive than the strong acid baseline (−57.0 kJ/mol), indicating that 9.2 kJ/mol of energy was consumed in the endothermic ionisation of X during the neutralisation. A strong acid would give ΔHn within ±2–3 kJ/mol of −57.0 kJ/mol.
Marking notes. 1 mark — correct calculation: ΔH(ionisation) = +9.2 kJ/mol. 1 mark — correctly classifies as weak acid. 1 mark — justification references the significant deviation from −57 kJ/mol and endothermic ionisation. All three required.
Section 1 · Short answer · 3 marks · Band 4
Sample response. Ranking (most to least exothermic): (i) HCl + NaOH (−57.0) > (iii) CH3COOH + NaOH (−55.4) > (ii) HCl + NH3 (−52.2) > (iv) CH3COOH + NH3 (−49.5). Justification for (ii) vs (iii): NH3 is a weak base with a larger proton-acceptance enthalpy (+4.8 kJ/mol deviation) compared to acetic acid’s ionisation enthalpy (+1.6 kJ/mol deviation), so HCl + NH3 is less exothermic than CH3COOH + NaOH.
Marking notes. 2 marks for correct ordering of all four combinations (1 mark if one error). 1 mark for a specific, accurate justification of (ii) vs (iii) referencing ionisation/proton-acceptance enthalpy magnitudes.
Section 1 · Short answer · 4 marks · Band 4–5
Sample response. Mix 50.0 mL of the unknown acid (1.00 mol/L) with 50.0 mL of 1.00 mol/L NaOH in a polystyrene foam cup. Record Tinitial and Tmax; calculate q = mcΔT (m = 100.0 g) and ΔHn = −q/n(H2O). Repeat with 1.00 mol/L HCl + 1.00 mol/L NaOH as a reference. If ΔHn of the unknown is within ±2–3 kJ/mol of −57 kJ/mol, classify as strong; if significantly more positive, classify as weak. Controlled variables: (1) Concentration held at 1.00 mol/L for both acids and the base — so n(H2O) is the same in each trial, allowing ΔHn per-mole comparison. (2) Volume held at 50.0 mL + 50.0 mL — same mass of solution (m = 100.0 g) in both experiments. (3) Tinitial must be the same — so ΔT reflects only the reaction enthalpy, not any pre-existing temperature difference. (4) Same calorimeter (foam cup) — same heat capacity correction applies to both.
Marking notes. 1 mark — valid procedure described (mix equal volumes, record T, calculate ΔHn). 1 mark — comparison criterion stated (ΔHn close to / significantly more positive than −57 kJ/mol). 2 marks — at least two controlled variables named with correct justification (1 mark per variable + reason; accept any two from concentration, volume, Tinitial, same calorimeter).
Section 2 · Data response · 9 marks · Band 4–5
Part (a) — ΔHn calculations.
n(H2O) = 1.00 × 0.0500 = 0.0500 mol for both trials.
HCl + NaOH: ΔT = 26.8 − 20.0 = 6.8°C; q = 100.0 × 4.18 × 6.8 = 2842.4 J = 2.842 kJ; ΔHn = −2.842 / 0.0500 = −56.8 kJ/mol.
CH3COOH + NaOH: ΔT = 26.6 − 20.0 = 6.6°C; q = 100.0 × 4.18 × 6.6 = 2758.8 J = 2.759 kJ; ΔHn = −2.759 / 0.0500 = −55.2 kJ/mol.
Marking notes. 2 marks for each correct ΔHn (1 for correct q, 1 for correct ΔHn with sign) = 4 marks total.
Part (b) — ionisation enthalpy and sign.
ΔH(ionisation CH3COOH) = ΔHn(CH3COOH) − ΔHn(HCl) = −55.2 − (−56.8) = +1.6 kJ/mol. The positive sign indicates the ionisation of CH3COOH is endothermic: energy must be absorbed from the solution to break the O–H bond in the carboxyl group and release the proton. This energy absorption reduces the net temperature rise measured.
Marking notes. 1 mark — correct value (+1.6 kJ/mol, accept +1–2 kJ/mol range based on rounded ΔHn values). 1 mark — positive sign explained as endothermic bond-breaking. 1 mark — explicitly states energy is absorbed, reducing temperature rise measured. [3 marks]
Part (c) — heat released per hour.
Heat released = 8000 mol/h × 55.2 kJ/mol = 441 600 kJ/h = 441.6 MJ/h (accept 440–443 MJ/h).
Marking notes. 1 mark — correct multiplication (8000 × ΔHn). 1 mark — correct unit conversion to MJ (divide by 1000). Total for part (c): 2 marks.
Section 3 · Extended response · 6 marks · Band 5–6
Sample response. Enthalpy of neutralisation data is highly useful for classifying an unknown acid as strong or weak, but cannot alone determine Ka.
The molecular-level mechanism for the enthalpy difference is as follows: when a strong acid is neutralised with NaOH, H+ ions are already present in solution before mixing (complete ionisation), so the only enthalpy change is from forming the O–H bonds in liquid water: H+(aq) + OH−(aq) → H2O(l), ΔH ≈ −57 kJ/mol. When a weak acid is neutralised, most molecules are intact before mixing. OH− drives the equilibrium ionisation of the weak acid — an endothermic bond-breaking step. By Hess’s Law, the measured ΔHn = −57 + ΔH(ionisation), giving a less negative value than for a strong acid. The larger the ionisation enthalpy (the weaker the acid), the more positive ΔHn becomes.
The usefulness of ΔHn for classification: if ΔHn ≈ −57 kJ/mol (within ±2–3 kJ/mol foam cup precision), the acid is strong; if significantly more positive (e.g. −50 to −55 kJ/mol), the acid is weak. This is a reliable classification in most school and bench-scale settings.
Limitation of foam cup calorimetry: the precision of (±2–3 kJ/mol) means two weak acids with similar Ka values and similar ΔH(ionisation) values may not be distinguishable by calorimetry alone. For example, two acids with ΔHn values of −55.4 and −55.8 kJ/mol could not be reliably separated. Additionally, calorimetry provides no information about Ka: knowing ΔH(ionisation) = +2.0 kJ/mol does not allow calculation of Ka, since Ka is a function of [H+] at equilibrium (a different thermodynamic quantity).
Role of pH in complementing calorimetry: pH measurement at a known concentration gives [H+] directly, from which Ka can be calculated: Ka = [H+]2 / (c − [H+]). pH measurement is also more precise (digital probes to ±0.01 pH units) and can resolve two weak acids that calorimetry cannot. Together, the two methods provide both thermodynamic (ΔHn) and equilibrium (Ka) characterisation of the acid.
Marking criteria. 1 mark — correct molecular mechanism for strong acid (fully ionised, no ionisation cost, H+ + OH− → H2O only). 1 mark — correct mechanism for weak acid (partially ionised, OH− drives equilibrium ionisation, endothermic bond-breaking reduces net ΔHn). 1 mark — correct classification criterion (ΔHn ≈ −57 = strong; significantly more positive = weak). 1 mark — specific limitation of foam cup calorimetry referenced (precision ±2–3 kJ/mol cannot resolve similar weak acids OR cannot determine Ka). 1 mark — pH measurement explained as providing [H+] → Ka (equilibrium information not available from calorimetry). 1 mark — explicit evaluative judgement: calorimetry is useful for classification but incomplete for full characterisation; pH complements it by providing Ka.
Section 3 · Source critique · 5 marks · Band 4–5
Scientific flaw. The claim is incorrect. While it is true that neutralisation always forms one mole of water per mole of H+ reacted, the heat released per mole of water is not the same for all acids — it depends on whether the acid is strong or weak. For strong acids (e.g. HCl), H+ is already present in solution before the reaction, so the only energy change is from forming the O–H bond in water: ΔHn ≈ −57 kJ/mol. For weak acids (e.g. CH3COOH), most molecules are un-ionised before reaction. To provide H+ for neutralisation, the weak acid must ionise during the reaction — an endothermic step. This endothermic ionisation energy is subtracted from the exothermic H+ + OH− → H2O energy, giving a less negative ΔHn (e.g. −55.4 kJ/mol for acetic acid). The claim treats neutralisation as a single step involving only water formation, ignoring the additional endothermic ionisation step required for weak acids. The correct statement is: ΔHn for a weak acid + strong base is always more positive (less exothermic) than for a strong acid + strong base, because the ionisation of the weak acid is endothermic and consumes part of the water-formation energy.
Marking criteria. 1 mark — correctly identifies the flaw: claim treats all acids as giving the same ΔHn per mole. 1 mark — correctly states weak acid neutralisation gives a less negative (more positive) ΔHn with an example value. 1 mark — explains the molecular mechanism: weak acid ionisation is endothermic and occurs during neutralisation. 1 mark — uses Hess’s Law framing: net ΔHn = water-formation energy − ionisation energy (or equivalent). 1 mark — reformulates the correct statement explicitly (weak acid ΔHn more positive than strong acid ΔHn).