Skip to content
HSCScience Chemistry · Y12 · M5
0 XP
🪙0
🔥0
Lv 1
⚗️
Chemistry Y12 · Module 5 · Lesson 9 of 18
IQ3 — Keq, ICE Tables & Reaction Quotient

Writing Keq Expressions — The Rules

In 1864, Norwegian chemists Cato Guldberg and Peter Waage at the University of Christiania published the first equilibrium expression — relating the ratio of product to reactant concentrations to a constant they called K. They measured K for the N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO equilibrium and found it was 1 × 10⁻³⁰ at 25°C — explaining why 78% N₂ and 21% O₂ in our atmosphere never spontaneously react.

Understand Apply Interpret
Today's hook: In 1864, Guldberg and Waage at the University of Christiania discovered that a single ratio of concentrations — raised to stoichiometric powers — is always constant at equilibrium. That ratio is Keq, and learning to write it correctly is the gateway to every calculation in this module.
0/5TASKS
Worksheets

Practise this lesson

Four printable worksheets that build from the foundations up to exam-style questions — start at whatever level suits you.

Think First

Three reactions are written below with their Keq values at 25°C. Before reading anything about Keq expressions or magnitude — predict for each reaction whether you would expect to find mostly reactants, mostly products, or significant amounts of both in an equilibrium mixture.

(1) N₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO(g), Keq = 1 × 10⁻³⁰
(2) H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g), Keq = 54
(3) 2NO(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g), Keq = 1 × 10¹²

Write your three predictions and the reasoning behind each before reading on. You will revisit this after Card 3.

Learning Intentions

Know

  • Write correct Keq expressions for homogeneous and heterogeneous equilibria, excluding pure solids and pure liquids
  • Explain why pure solids and pure liquids are excluded from Keq expressions

Understand

  • Interpret the magnitude of Keq to predict whether a mixture is predominantly products, reactants, or a mixture of both
  • Justify why only temperature changes Keq, while concentration, pressure, and catalysts do not

Can Do

  • Apply the reciprocal and multiplier relationships to convert Keq values when equations are reversed or scaled
Key Terms
Equilibrium constant (Keq)
The ratio of product to reactant concentrations at equilibrium, each raised to stoichiometric power.
Homogeneous equilibrium
Equilibrium where all species are in the same phase.
Heterogeneous equilibrium
Equilibrium where reactants/products are in different phases; pure solids and liquids omitted from Keq.
Stoichiometric coefficient
The number in front of a species in a balanced equation; used as the exponent in the Keq expression.
Keq expression
Written as Keq = [products]^p / [reactants]^r using molar concentrations in mol L⁻¹.
Inverse equilibrium
If the reaction is reversed, the new Keq = 1/original Keq; if multiplied by n, Keq is raised to the nth power.
01
Understand

1. The Keq Expression — Rules and Derivation

The equilibrium constant expression is not an arbitrary formula — it is derived from the thermodynamic condition that at equilibrium, the free energy of the system is at its minimum, and the ratio of products to reactants at that minimum has a fixed value at a given temperature.

For the general reversible reaction aA + bB ⇌ cC + dD:

Keq = [C]c × [D]d / ([A]a × [B]b)

The rules for writing Keq expressions:

  1. Products appear in the numerator; reactants in the denominator
  2. Each concentration is raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient in the balanced equation as written
  3. Pure solids are excluded (activity = 1 by convention)
  4. Pure liquids are excluded, including water when it acts as the solvent
  5. Aqueous species (aq) are included
  6. Gases (g) are included

Example — Haber process: N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g)

Keq = [NH₃]² / ([N₂][H₂]³)

Powers match stoichiometric coefficients: NH₃ coefficient = 2 → squared; N₂ coefficient = 1; H₂ coefficient = 3 → cubed.

Species TypeIncluded in Keq?Reason
Gas (g)YesConcentration affects equilibrium
Aqueous (aq)YesConcentration affects equilibrium
Pure solid (s)NoActivity = 1; fixed composition
Pure liquid (l) / H₂O(l) as solventNoActivity = 1; fixed composition
Water as reactant/product in gas phaseYesH₂O(g) — concentration varies
Must do
The stoichiometric coefficients in the Keq expression must match the balanced equation AS WRITTEN. If the Haber process is written as ½N₂ + 3/2H₂ ⇌ NH₃, then Keq = [NH₃]/([N₂]^½[H₂]^(3/2)) — a different numerical value. Always check which version of the equation is given.
Most common error in IQ3
Including pure solids in the Keq expression. For CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g), the correct Keq = [CO₂]. Students write Keq = [CaO][CO₂]/[CaCO₃] — this is wrong. Never include a solid in a Keq expression.

Keq = [products]^coeff / [reactants]^coeff; powers = stoichiometric coefficients; exclude pure solids (s) and pure liquids/water-as-solvent (l); include gases (g), aqueous species (aq), and H₂O(g) in gas-phase reactions; stoichiometry must match the equation as written.

Pause — copy the highlighted Keq expression rules into your book before moving on.

WRITING Keq EXPRESSIONS — DECISION FLOWCHART Balanced equation given Write: Keq = [products]^coeff / [reactants]^coeff For each species: what is its state? (s) or pure (l) solvent EXCLUDE (g) or (aq) or H₂O(g) INCLUDE

Which is the correct Keq expression for CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g)?

02
Apply

2. Writing Keq Expressions — Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Examples

We just saw the six rules for writing any Keq expression. That raises a question: how do those rules apply to the specific types of reactions we encounter — homogeneous gas-phase, aqueous, and mixed-phase heterogeneous equilibria? This card answers it → four worked examples including the tricky H₂O cases.

The rule is always the same — products over reactants, stoichiometric powers, exclude solids and pure liquids — but applying it to heterogeneous equilibria (mixed phases) requires careful identification of which species to include.

Homogeneous equilibria (same phase):

Example 1: 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2SO₃(g) — all gases

Keq = [SO₃]² / ([SO₂]²[O₂])

Example 2: CH₃COOH(aq) + C₂H₅OH(aq) ⇌ CH₃COOC₂H₅(aq) + H₂O(l)

Water is the solvent (pure liquid) → excluded.

Keq = [CH₃COOC₂H₅] / ([CH₃COOH][C₂H₅OH])

Heterogeneous equilibria (mixed phases):

Example 3: CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g)

Both CaCO₃ and CaO are pure solids → excluded. Only CO₂(g) remains.

Keq = [CO₂]

Example 4: Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g)

Fe₃O₄ and Fe are pure solids → excluded. H₂ and H₂O are gases → included. Note: H₂O is a gas here, NOT the solvent — include it.

Keq = [H₂O]⁴ / [H₂]⁴
Water requires special attention
When H₂O(l) is the solvent in an aqueous reaction, exclude it. When H₂O(g) is a product of a gas-phase reaction (e.g. combustion, steam reactions), include it. The state symbol tells you which case applies.
Common error
Including H₂O in Keq expressions for reactions in aqueous solution. For CH₃COOH(aq) ⇌ CH₃COO⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq), the Ka expression is [CH₃COO⁻][H⁺]/[CH₃COOH] — water is excluded (it is the solvent).

Heterogeneous equilibria: check each species' state symbol; exclude (s) and pure liquid solvent; include (g) and (aq); water is the critical edge case — H₂O(l) as solvent is excluded, but H₂O(g) in a gas-phase reaction is included (e.g. Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g) → Keq = [H₂O]⁴/[H₂]⁴).

Add the highlighted heterogeneous Keq rules to your notes before continuing.

True or False: For the equilibrium Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g), the H₂O should be included in the Keq expression.

03
Interpret

3. Interpreting Keq Magnitude

We just saw how to write Keq expressions for both homogeneous and heterogeneous equilibria. That raises a question: once we have a Keq value, what does the number itself tell us about the mixture at equilibrium? This card answers it → the three-zone magnitude scale from reactant-favoured to product-favoured.

The numerical value of Keq encodes everything about where an equilibrium lies — and learning to read it at a glance is one of the most powerful interpretive skills in Year 12 Chemistry.

Keq ValueEquilibrium PositionWhat the Mixture Looks Like
> 10³Strongly products favouredAlmost entirely products; reactants nearly exhausted
10⁻¹ to 10³ (≈ 1)IntermediateSignificant amounts of both reactants and products
< 10⁻³Strongly reactants favouredAlmost entirely reactants; very little product

Examples revisited from Think First:

  • N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO, Keq = 1 × 10⁻³⁰ — reactants strongly favoured → almost no NO at room temperature → the atmosphere is stable
  • H₂ + I₂ ⇌ 2HI, Keq = 54 — intermediate → significant HI AND measurable H₂ and I₂ coexist
  • 2NO + O₂ ⇌ 2NO₂, Keq = 1 × 10¹² — products strongly favoured → almost entirely NO₂; virtually no NO and O₂ remain
HSC answer format
"Keq = 3.5 × 10⁻⁸ is much less than 1, so the equilibrium strongly favours reactants — very little product is present at equilibrium." Always interpret the magnitude qualitatively, not just numerically.
Keq MAGNITUDE SCALE 10⁻³⁰ 10⁻³ ≈ 1 10³ 10³⁰ Reactants strongly favoured Both significant Products strongly favoured N₂+O₂⇌2NO (10⁻³⁰) H₂+I₂⇌2HI (54) combustion (10⁸⁰)
Insight
The fact that Keq for N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO is 10⁻³⁰ at room temperature is why life exists. If this equilibrium were even Keq = 10⁻¹⁰, significant NO would form in the atmosphere — NO is a toxic pollutant that would have prevented evolution of aerobic life. At high temperatures in lightning and engine combustion, enough thermal energy forces the reaction forward — this is why smog contains NOₓ.

Keq magnitude: >10³ → products strongly favoured (mixture almost entirely products); ~1 → both reactants and products significant; <10⁻³ → reactants strongly favoured (very little product); always state the qualitative interpretation in HSC answers alongside the number.

Pause — copy the highlighted Keq magnitude scale into your book before the check below.

A reaction has Keq = 8.5 × 10⁻¹⁰. Which correctly describes the equilibrium mixture?

04
Apply

4. Keq and the Balanced Equation — Reciprocal and Multiplier Relationships

We just saw how to interpret the magnitude of Keq. That raises a question: if the same reaction can be written in different ways (reversed, scaled), how does Keq change — and why must we always check this before a calculation? This card answers it → the reciprocal and multiplier relationships between equation form and Keq value.

Keq is not an absolute property of a reaction — it is a property of the equation as written. Change the equation and you change the Keq value, even though the underlying chemistry is identical.

Relationship 1 — Reversed equation:

If A + B ⇌ C + D has Keq = K, then C + D ⇌ A + B has Keq = 1/K.

Example

N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g), Keq = 0.013 at 500°C

Reverse: 2NH₃(g) ⇌ N₂(g) + 3H₂(g), Keq = 1/0.013 = 77

The reverse equilibrium strongly favours decomposition of NH₃ back to N₂ and H₂ at 500°C.

Relationship 2 — Multiplied equation:

If all stoichiometric coefficients are multiplied by n, the new Keq = (original Keq)ⁿ.

Example

If N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃ has Keq = K, then ½N₂ + 3/2H₂ ⇌ NH₃ has Keq = K^(½) = √K

Dividing all coefficients by 2 takes the square root of Keq.

Systematic check before any Keq calculation
(1) Is the equation reversed? → take the reciprocal. (2) Are the coefficients multiplied or divided by a factor? → raise Keq to that power. Do both checks before starting any calculation.
Common error
Using the wrong Keq value because the equation is written differently from the one the Keq was given for. If Keq = 54 is given for H₂ + I₂ ⇌ 2HI, but the question asks about 2HI ⇌ H₂ + I₂, the Keq for the reversed equation is 1/54 = 0.019. Using 54 instead gives the completely wrong answer.

Equation manipulations change Keq: reversed equation → Keq(new) = 1/Keq(original); all coefficients multiplied by n → Keq(new) = Keq(original)ⁿ; always perform two checks before using a Keq value — (1) is the equation reversed? (2) are the coefficients scaled?

Add the highlighted reciprocal and multiplier rules to your notes before the check below.

The Keq for 2SO₃(g) ⇌ 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) is 1.8 × 10⁻⁶ at 600°C. What is Keq for SO₃(g) ⇌ SO₂(g) + ½O₂(g) at the same temperature?

Cross-lesson links: Guldberg and Waage's 1864 equilibrium expression introduced here is the foundation for ICE table calculations in L10, the reaction quotient Q in L12, and Ka/Kb expressions in L14. The coefficient-as-exponent rule in Card 4 is the most common arithmetic error in L10 ICE tables. Temperature dependence of Keq introduced in Card 5 is quantified in L13.
05
Justify

5. Temperature Dependence of Keq — The Only Variable That Matters

We just saw how to adjust Keq when the equation is reversed or scaled. That raises a question: what is the thermodynamic reason only temperature changes Keq, while concentration, pressure, and catalysts cannot? This card answers it → via the ΔG° = −RT ln Keq relationship showing Keq is fixed by temperature alone.

Add a catalyst to a flask at equilibrium — the colour doesn't change. Add more reactant — the colour changes temporarily, then re-establishes. Heat the flask — and the colour shifts permanently to a new equilibrium. Only temperature changes the value of Keq itself; everything else only shifts the equilibrium position.

Keq is a thermodynamic constant — it is fixed by the temperature alone, and changing anything else changes the equilibrium position but not the value of Keq. This is because Keq is related to the Gibbs free energy change: ΔG° = −RT ln Keq. Since ΔG° depends on temperature (through the TΔS term), Keq also depends on temperature.

  • Exothermic forward reaction: increasing T → ΔG° less negative → Keq decreases; decreasing T → ΔG° more negative → Keq increases
  • Endothermic forward reaction: opposite — increasing T → ΔG° more negative → Keq increases
  • Concentration changes: shift equilibrium position but Keq value unchanged
  • Pressure changes: shift equilibrium position for gas reactions with unequal moles — Keq unchanged
  • Catalyst: no shift in position, no change in Keq
Common HSC question
"A student claims that adding more reactant to an equilibrium mixture increases Keq. Evaluate this claim." Answer: incorrect. Adding reactant shifts equilibrium position to the right (more products form) but the ratio of equilibrium concentrations at the new equilibrium still satisfies the same Keq expression — Keq is unchanged. Only temperature changes Keq.
Common error
"Increasing pressure increases Keq because more products are formed." Wrong — more products are formed at the new equilibrium (position shifts right) but the Keq expression value at the new equilibrium is the same as before. Position shifted; Keq did not.

Keq depends ONLY on temperature via ΔG° = −RT ln Keq: exothermic forward (ΔH < 0) → increasing T decreases Keq; endothermic forward (ΔH > 0) → increasing T increases Keq; concentration, pressure, and catalyst changes shift equilibrium position but leave Keq unchanged.

Pause — copy the highlighted temperature-Keq relationship into your book before the check below.

A student adds more H₂ gas to the equilibrium N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃. After the system reaches its new equilibrium, what is the value of Keq compared to before?

Keq Expression Rules

General form: aA + bB ⇌ cC + dD → Keq = [C]c[D]d / ([A]a[B]b)

Include: gases (g), aqueous species (aq)

Exclude: pure solids (s), pure liquids (l) including liquid water as solvent

Magnitude guide: Keq >> 1 → products favoured | Keq ≈ 1 → significant both | Keq << 1 → reactants favoured

Reciprocal: reverse equation → Keq(new) = 1/Keq

Multiplier: multiply all coefficients by n → Keq(new) = Keqn

Keq depends ONLY on temperature

Worked Example 1 — Writing Keq Expressions

Problem: Write the Keq expression for each equilibrium and identify any excluded species. (a) 2NO(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g). (b) AgCl(s) ⇌ Ag⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq). (c) CO₂(g) + C(s) ⇌ 2CO(g). (d) CH₃COOH(aq) ⇌ CH₃COO⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq).

1
(a): All species are gases — all included. Products: NO₂ (coefficient 2) → [NO₂]². Reactants: NO (coefficient 2) → [NO]²; O₂ (coefficient 1) → [O₂]. Keq = [NO₂]² / ([NO]²[O₂])
2
(b): AgCl is a pure solid → excluded. Ag⁺ and Cl⁻ are aqueous → included. Keq = [Ag⁺][Cl⁻] (This is the Ksp expression for AgCl — studied in L15–L16.)
3
(c): C is a pure solid → excluded. CO₂ and CO are gases → included. Products: CO (coefficient 2) → [CO]². Reactants: CO₂ → [CO₂]. Keq = [CO]² / [CO₂]
4
(d): CH₃COOH, CH₃COO⁻, H⁺ are aqueous → included. Water is the solvent → excluded. Keq = [CH₃COO⁻][H⁺] / [CH₃COOH] (This is the Ka expression — studied in L14.)
Worked Example 2 — Band 5–6 — Interpreting Keq Magnitude and Reciprocal Relationships

Problem: The equilibrium constant for N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g) is Keq = 977 at 300°C and Keq = 0.013 at 500°C. (a) Interpret both Keq values in terms of equilibrium position. (b) Write the Keq expression for the reverse reaction 2NH₃(g) ⇌ N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) and calculate its value at 500°C. (c) A student claims Keq = 0.013 means less than 1.3% of N₂ and H₂ has converted to NH₃ at equilibrium. Evaluate this claim.

1
(a): Keq = 977 at 300°C — much greater than 1 → products strongly favoured → at equilibrium, the mixture is mostly NH₃ with relatively little N₂ and H₂ remaining. Higher yield at lower temperature is consistent with exothermic forward reaction. Keq = 0.013 at 500°C — much less than 1 → reactants strongly favoured → mostly N₂ and H₂ at equilibrium; little NH₃. This is why the industrial process at 450°C gives only ~15–25% conversion per pass.
2
(b): Reversing the equation → Keq(reverse) = 1/Keq = 1/0.013 = 76.9 at 500°C. Keq(reverse) = [N₂][H₂]³ / [NH₃]² = 76.9 This large value confirms that at 500°C, NH₃ decomposition back to N₂ and H₂ is strongly favoured.
3
(c): The student's claim is incorrect. Keq = 0.013 tells you the ratio [NH₃]²/([N₂][H₂]³) = 0.013 at equilibrium — it does not directly give percentage conversion without knowing initial concentrations and pressure. At 200 atm, the actual conversion is approximately 15–25% per pass. The percentage conversion depends on BOTH Keq AND the initial conditions. Keq is not a direct percentage.
Interactive Tool — Keq Calculations Open fullscreen ↗
In the Keq Calculator, if the equilibrium concentration of products is much greater than reactants, K is…
Fill the blanks+4 XP

Write the Keq expression for: 2SO&sub2;(g) + O&sub2;(g) ⇌ 2SO&sub3;(g)

Keq = [SO&sub3;] ÷ ([SO&sub2;] × [O&sub2;])

Pure solids and liquids are from Keq expressions.

A Keq value much greater than 1 indicates the equilibrium position favours the .

Complete the Learn phase to unlock practice questions.

Extended Response

A student is given the following information: For the reaction 2HI(g) ⇌ H₂(g) + I₂(g), Keq = 0.020 at 400°C. Using this information: (a) Write the Keq expression for 2HI(g) ⇌ H₂(g) + I₂(g). (b) Write the Keq expression and calculate Keq for the reverse reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g) at 400°C. (c) Interpret both Keq values qualitatively. (d) The student claims that adding more HI gas to the system at 400°C will increase Keq. Evaluate this claim with full explanation. (e) State what change would be needed to increase Keq for the reverse reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g), which is exothermic.

How did your thinking change?

Look back at your Think First predictions for the three reactions. Recall Guldberg and Waage's 1864 discovery at the University of Christiania — they defined K as the ratio of product to reactant concentrations raised to stoichiometric powers. Were your predictions about which reaction favours products correct? How does the magnitude of Keq relate to what you predicted about the equilibrium mixture? What does the N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO example (Keq = 1 × 10⁻³⁰) tell us about our atmosphere?

← Lesson 8 Lesson 10 →
🎓
Want help with Writing Keq Expressions?

Work through this topic 1-on-1 with an experienced HSC tutor.

Book a free session →