Writing Keq Expressions — The Rules
In 1864, Norwegian chemists Cato Guldberg and Peter Waage at the University of Christiania published the first equilibrium expression — relating the ratio of product to reactant concentrations to a constant they called K. They measured K for the N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO equilibrium and found it was 1 × 10⁻³⁰ at 25°C — explaining why 78% N₂ and 21% O₂ in our atmosphere never spontaneously react.
Practise this lesson
Four printable worksheets that build from the foundations up to exam-style questions — start at whatever level suits you.
Three reactions are written below with their Keq values at 25°C. Before reading anything about Keq expressions or magnitude — predict for each reaction whether you would expect to find mostly reactants, mostly products, or significant amounts of both in an equilibrium mixture.
(1) N₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO(g), Keq = 1 × 10⁻³⁰
(2) H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g), Keq = 54
(3) 2NO(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g), Keq = 1 × 10¹²
Write your three predictions and the reasoning behind each before reading on. You will revisit this after Card 3.
Know
- Write correct Keq expressions for homogeneous and heterogeneous equilibria, excluding pure solids and pure liquids
- Explain why pure solids and pure liquids are excluded from Keq expressions
Understand
- Interpret the magnitude of Keq to predict whether a mixture is predominantly products, reactants, or a mixture of both
- Justify why only temperature changes Keq, while concentration, pressure, and catalysts do not
Can Do
- Apply the reciprocal and multiplier relationships to convert Keq values when equations are reversed or scaled
1. The Keq Expression — Rules and Derivation
The equilibrium constant expression is not an arbitrary formula — it is derived from the thermodynamic condition that at equilibrium, the free energy of the system is at its minimum, and the ratio of products to reactants at that minimum has a fixed value at a given temperature.
For the general reversible reaction aA + bB ⇌ cC + dD:
Keq = [C]c × [D]d / ([A]a × [B]b)The rules for writing Keq expressions:
- Products appear in the numerator; reactants in the denominator
- Each concentration is raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient in the balanced equation as written
- Pure solids are excluded (activity = 1 by convention)
- Pure liquids are excluded, including water when it acts as the solvent
- Aqueous species (aq) are included
- Gases (g) are included
Example — Haber process: N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g)
Keq = [NH₃]² / ([N₂][H₂]³)Powers match stoichiometric coefficients: NH₃ coefficient = 2 → squared; N₂ coefficient = 1; H₂ coefficient = 3 → cubed.
| Species Type | Included in Keq? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Gas (g) | Yes | Concentration affects equilibrium |
| Aqueous (aq) | Yes | Concentration affects equilibrium |
| Pure solid (s) | No | Activity = 1; fixed composition |
| Pure liquid (l) / H₂O(l) as solvent | No | Activity = 1; fixed composition |
| Water as reactant/product in gas phase | Yes | H₂O(g) — concentration varies |
Keq = [products]^coeff / [reactants]^coeff; powers = stoichiometric coefficients; exclude pure solids (s) and pure liquids/water-as-solvent (l); include gases (g), aqueous species (aq), and H₂O(g) in gas-phase reactions; stoichiometry must match the equation as written.
Pause — copy the highlighted Keq expression rules into your book before moving on.
Which is the correct Keq expression for CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g)?
2. Writing Keq Expressions — Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Examples
We just saw the six rules for writing any Keq expression. That raises a question: how do those rules apply to the specific types of reactions we encounter — homogeneous gas-phase, aqueous, and mixed-phase heterogeneous equilibria? This card answers it → four worked examples including the tricky H₂O cases.
The rule is always the same — products over reactants, stoichiometric powers, exclude solids and pure liquids — but applying it to heterogeneous equilibria (mixed phases) requires careful identification of which species to include.
Homogeneous equilibria (same phase):
Example 1: 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2SO₃(g) — all gases
Keq = [SO₃]² / ([SO₂]²[O₂])Example 2: CH₃COOH(aq) + C₂H₅OH(aq) ⇌ CH₃COOC₂H₅(aq) + H₂O(l)
Water is the solvent (pure liquid) → excluded.
Keq = [CH₃COOC₂H₅] / ([CH₃COOH][C₂H₅OH])Heterogeneous equilibria (mixed phases):
Example 3: CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g)
Both CaCO₃ and CaO are pure solids → excluded. Only CO₂(g) remains.
Keq = [CO₂]Example 4: Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g)
Fe₃O₄ and Fe are pure solids → excluded. H₂ and H₂O are gases → included. Note: H₂O is a gas here, NOT the solvent — include it.
Keq = [H₂O]⁴ / [H₂]⁴Heterogeneous equilibria: check each species' state symbol; exclude (s) and pure liquid solvent; include (g) and (aq); water is the critical edge case — H₂O(l) as solvent is excluded, but H₂O(g) in a gas-phase reaction is included (e.g. Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g) → Keq = [H₂O]⁴/[H₂]⁴).
Add the highlighted heterogeneous Keq rules to your notes before continuing.
True or False: For the equilibrium Fe₃O₄(s) + 4H₂(g) ⇌ 3Fe(s) + 4H₂O(g), the H₂O should be included in the Keq expression.
3. Interpreting Keq Magnitude
We just saw how to write Keq expressions for both homogeneous and heterogeneous equilibria. That raises a question: once we have a Keq value, what does the number itself tell us about the mixture at equilibrium? This card answers it → the three-zone magnitude scale from reactant-favoured to product-favoured.
The numerical value of Keq encodes everything about where an equilibrium lies — and learning to read it at a glance is one of the most powerful interpretive skills in Year 12 Chemistry.
| Keq Value | Equilibrium Position | What the Mixture Looks Like |
|---|---|---|
| > 10³ | Strongly products favoured | Almost entirely products; reactants nearly exhausted |
| 10⁻¹ to 10³ (≈ 1) | Intermediate | Significant amounts of both reactants and products |
| < 10⁻³ | Strongly reactants favoured | Almost entirely reactants; very little product |
Examples revisited from Think First:
- N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO, Keq = 1 × 10⁻³⁰ — reactants strongly favoured → almost no NO at room temperature → the atmosphere is stable
- H₂ + I₂ ⇌ 2HI, Keq = 54 — intermediate → significant HI AND measurable H₂ and I₂ coexist
- 2NO + O₂ ⇌ 2NO₂, Keq = 1 × 10¹² — products strongly favoured → almost entirely NO₂; virtually no NO and O₂ remain
Keq magnitude: >10³ → products strongly favoured (mixture almost entirely products); ~1 → both reactants and products significant; <10⁻³ → reactants strongly favoured (very little product); always state the qualitative interpretation in HSC answers alongside the number.
Pause — copy the highlighted Keq magnitude scale into your book before the check below.
A reaction has Keq = 8.5 × 10⁻¹⁰. Which correctly describes the equilibrium mixture?
4. Keq and the Balanced Equation — Reciprocal and Multiplier Relationships
We just saw how to interpret the magnitude of Keq. That raises a question: if the same reaction can be written in different ways (reversed, scaled), how does Keq change — and why must we always check this before a calculation? This card answers it → the reciprocal and multiplier relationships between equation form and Keq value.
Keq is not an absolute property of a reaction — it is a property of the equation as written. Change the equation and you change the Keq value, even though the underlying chemistry is identical.
Relationship 1 — Reversed equation:
If A + B ⇌ C + D has Keq = K, then C + D ⇌ A + B has Keq = 1/K.
Example
N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g), Keq = 0.013 at 500°C
Reverse: 2NH₃(g) ⇌ N₂(g) + 3H₂(g), Keq = 1/0.013 = 77
The reverse equilibrium strongly favours decomposition of NH₃ back to N₂ and H₂ at 500°C.
Relationship 2 — Multiplied equation:
If all stoichiometric coefficients are multiplied by n, the new Keq = (original Keq)ⁿ.
Example
If N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃ has Keq = K, then ½N₂ + 3/2H₂ ⇌ NH₃ has Keq = K^(½) = √K
Dividing all coefficients by 2 takes the square root of Keq.
Equation manipulations change Keq: reversed equation → Keq(new) = 1/Keq(original); all coefficients multiplied by n → Keq(new) = Keq(original)ⁿ; always perform two checks before using a Keq value — (1) is the equation reversed? (2) are the coefficients scaled?
Add the highlighted reciprocal and multiplier rules to your notes before the check below.
The Keq for 2SO₃(g) ⇌ 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) is 1.8 × 10⁻⁶ at 600°C. What is Keq for SO₃(g) ⇌ SO₂(g) + ½O₂(g) at the same temperature?
5. Temperature Dependence of Keq — The Only Variable That Matters
We just saw how to adjust Keq when the equation is reversed or scaled. That raises a question: what is the thermodynamic reason only temperature changes Keq, while concentration, pressure, and catalysts cannot? This card answers it → via the ΔG° = −RT ln Keq relationship showing Keq is fixed by temperature alone.
Add a catalyst to a flask at equilibrium — the colour doesn't change. Add more reactant — the colour changes temporarily, then re-establishes. Heat the flask — and the colour shifts permanently to a new equilibrium. Only temperature changes the value of Keq itself; everything else only shifts the equilibrium position.
Keq is a thermodynamic constant — it is fixed by the temperature alone, and changing anything else changes the equilibrium position but not the value of Keq. This is because Keq is related to the Gibbs free energy change: ΔG° = −RT ln Keq. Since ΔG° depends on temperature (through the TΔS term), Keq also depends on temperature.
- Exothermic forward reaction: increasing T → ΔG° less negative → Keq decreases; decreasing T → ΔG° more negative → Keq increases
- Endothermic forward reaction: opposite — increasing T → ΔG° more negative → Keq increases
- Concentration changes: shift equilibrium position but Keq value unchanged
- Pressure changes: shift equilibrium position for gas reactions with unequal moles — Keq unchanged
- Catalyst: no shift in position, no change in Keq
Keq depends ONLY on temperature via ΔG° = −RT ln Keq: exothermic forward (ΔH < 0) → increasing T decreases Keq; endothermic forward (ΔH > 0) → increasing T increases Keq; concentration, pressure, and catalyst changes shift equilibrium position but leave Keq unchanged.
Pause — copy the highlighted temperature-Keq relationship into your book before the check below.
A student adds more H₂ gas to the equilibrium N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃. After the system reaches its new equilibrium, what is the value of Keq compared to before?
General form: aA + bB ⇌ cC + dD → Keq = [C]c[D]d / ([A]a[B]b)
Include: gases (g), aqueous species (aq)
Exclude: pure solids (s), pure liquids (l) including liquid water as solvent
Magnitude guide: Keq >> 1 → products favoured | Keq ≈ 1 → significant both | Keq << 1 → reactants favoured
Reciprocal: reverse equation → Keq(new) = 1/Keq
Multiplier: multiply all coefficients by n → Keq(new) = Keqn
Keq depends ONLY on temperature
Problem: Write the Keq expression for each equilibrium and identify any excluded species. (a) 2NO(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g). (b) AgCl(s) ⇌ Ag⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq). (c) CO₂(g) + C(s) ⇌ 2CO(g). (d) CH₃COOH(aq) ⇌ CH₃COO⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq).
Problem: The equilibrium constant for N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g) is Keq = 977 at 300°C and Keq = 0.013 at 500°C. (a) Interpret both Keq values in terms of equilibrium position. (b) Write the Keq expression for the reverse reaction 2NH₃(g) ⇌ N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) and calculate its value at 500°C. (c) A student claims Keq = 0.013 means less than 1.3% of N₂ and H₂ has converted to NH₃ at equilibrium. Evaluate this claim.
Write the Keq expression for: 2SO&sub2;(g) + O&sub2;(g) ⇌ 2SO&sub3;(g)
Pure solids and liquids are from Keq expressions.
A Keq value much greater than 1 indicates the equilibrium position favours the .
Complete the Learn phase to unlock practice questions.
A student is given the following information: For the reaction 2HI(g) ⇌ H₂(g) + I₂(g), Keq = 0.020 at 400°C. Using this information: (a) Write the Keq expression for 2HI(g) ⇌ H₂(g) + I₂(g). (b) Write the Keq expression and calculate Keq for the reverse reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g) at 400°C. (c) Interpret both Keq values qualitatively. (d) The student claims that adding more HI gas to the system at 400°C will increase Keq. Evaluate this claim with full explanation. (e) State what change would be needed to increase Keq for the reverse reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g), which is exothermic.