️ Static vs Dynamic Equilibrium
In 1864, Scottish chemist Alexander Williamson demonstrated to the Chemical Society of London that ether synthesis was reversible — measuring that the same equilibrium concentration of diethyl ether formed whether he started from ethanol or from ether itself, proving that two opposing reactions were running simultaneously at identical rates.
Practise this lesson
Four printable worksheets that build from the foundations up to exam-style questions — start at whatever level suits you.
A rusted iron nail sits on a bench. A sealed bottle of sparkling water sits next to it. Both appear completely unchanged — nothing visible is happening in either system.
But chemists would say one of these is at static equilibrium and the other is at dynamic equilibrium. Before reading on — which is which, and what do you think the difference actually means at the particle level? Write your reasoning now. You will come back to this at the end of the lesson and evaluate whether your instinct was correct.
No calculation formulas this lesson — equilibrium is conceptual here.
Key facts
- The definition of static and dynamic equilibrium
- The two conditions required for dynamic equilibrium
- The distinction between open and closed systems
Concepts
- Why dynamic equilibrium requires molecular activity in both directions
- Why an open system cannot reach dynamic equilibrium
- How to read and draw rate-vs-time and concentration-vs-time graphs
Skills
- Classify systems as static equilibrium, dynamic equilibrium, or neither
- Describe particle diagrams at three stages: start, intermediate, equilibrium
- Explain the sparkling water and rusted nail examples in full chemical language
Core Content
Irreversible reactions · Forward rate = Reverse rate = 0
Static equilibrium is the chemical equivalent of a finished race — the runners have stopped, the result is fixed, and nothing is going to change unless something external intervenes.
Static equilibrium describes the state of a system after an irreversible reaction has gone to completion. There are no reactants remaining to react further, and the products are stable under the conditions. At static equilibrium there is no molecular activity — the forward reaction rate has fallen to zero (reactants exhausted), and the reverse reaction does not occur because the reaction is irreversible.
From both a macroscopic and a microscopic perspective, everything has stopped. The system is truly at rest.
Examples of static equilibrium: burning magnesium ribbon in air (once Mg is consumed, MgO remains, no reverse reaction); neutralisation of a strong acid with a strong base to completion (NaCl and water form and remain); decomposition of CaCO₃ in an open system where CO₂ escapes.
What to write in your book
- Static equilibrium: irreversible reaction gone to completion; forward rate = reverse rate = 0; no molecular activity; products only remain
- Examples: burning Mg ribbon, neutralisation of strong acid/base, CaCO₃ decomposition in open system
- The term "equilibrium" here means macroscopic state is stable — NOT that concentrations are equal
At static equilibrium, the reaction continues at a very slow rate.
Reversible reactions in closed systems · Both rates non-zero and equal
Dynamic equilibrium is chemistry's most counterintuitive idea — a system that looks completely still from the outside is actually a scene of constant molecular activity, with reactions running simultaneously in both directions.
Dynamic equilibrium occurs in a reversible reaction in a closed system when the forward reaction rate equals the reverse reaction rate — and both rates are non-zero. The concentration of every species remains constant over time, but this constancy is not because nothing is happening — it is because reactants are being converted to products at exactly the same rate as products are being converted back to reactants.
Net change is zero, but molecular change is constant. This is the critical distinction: macroscopic constancy does not mean microscopic stillness.
Two conditions required for dynamic equilibrium:
- The reaction must be reversible (written with ⇌)
- The system must be closed (no matter enters or leaves)
Example: In a sealed container, N₂O₄(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g) reaches dynamic equilibrium when the rate of N₂O₄ decomposing to NO₂ equals the rate of NO₂ combining to form N₂O₄. The brown colour of the mixture stabilises — not because the reaction has stopped, but because the two processes cancel each other out.
What to write in your book
- Dynamic equilibrium: forward rate = reverse rate ≠ 0; reversible reaction in a closed system
- Concentrations are CONSTANT — not equal; molecular activity is continuous
- Two conditions: (1) reversible reaction (⇌) and (2) closed system
- Example: N₂O₄(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g) in a sealed flask — stable brown colour despite ongoing reactions
At dynamic equilibrium, which of the following is correct?
The gateway condition for dynamic equilibrium
Whether a system can reach dynamic equilibrium is determined entirely by whether it is open or closed — and this distinction maps directly onto whether matter can enter or leave the system.
A closed system is one in which matter cannot enter or leave, although energy (heat) can be exchanged with the surroundings. Closed systems can reach dynamic equilibrium because concentrations can stabilise — there is no mechanism for reactants or products to escape. A sealed flask, a closed bottle, or a sealed reaction vessel are closed systems.
An open system is one in which matter can enter or leave. Open systems cannot reach dynamic equilibrium because products can escape (or reactants can be continuously added), preventing concentration from stabilising. A log fire, a car exhaust, and the human body are all open systems.
What to write in your book
- Closed system: matter cannot enter/leave (energy can); sealed flask, sealed bottle
- Open system: matter can enter/leave; log fire, human body, open beaker
- Dynamic equilibrium ONLY possible in a CLOSED system
- HSC checklist: (1) reversible? (2) closed system? Both required for dynamic equilibrium
Which of the following can reach dynamic equilibrium?
Static vs Dynamic Equilibrium — key differences at a glance
Core HSC graphical skill — appears repeatedly in Module 5
The approach to dynamic equilibrium has a characteristic graphical signature — and being able to read and draw this graph is a core HSC skill that appears repeatedly across Module 5.
A rate-vs-time graph for a reversible reaction approaching equilibrium has two curves:
- At time zero: the forward rate is at its maximum (high reactant concentration → frequent collisions); the reverse rate is zero (no products yet).
- As the reaction proceeds: the forward rate decreases as reactants are consumed; the reverse rate increases as products accumulate.
- At equilibrium: both curves meet at the same non-zero value and remain horizontal.
Rate-vs-time: forward rate starts high and falls; reverse rate starts at zero and rises; both meet at a non-zero equilibrium rate
What to write in your book
- Rate-vs-time graph: forward rate starts max → decreases; reverse rate starts 0 → increases
- Equilibrium point: where both curves MEET at same NON-ZERO value and go horizontal
- Both rates non-zero at equilibrium — never draw forward rate touching zero unless it's static equilibrium
On a rate-vs-time graph, the equilibrium point is where the forward rate _____ the reverse rate, and both become _____.
Three snapshots: start · intermediate · equilibrium
Particle diagrams make the abstract concrete — by counting the number of reactant and product particles at different points in time, you can see equilibrium as a property of the whole system rather than any individual molecule.
A particle diagram for a reversible reaction approaching equilibrium shows three snapshots:
The key insight is that the ratio at equilibrium depends on the specific reaction. For some reactions (large Keq), almost all particles are products; for others (small Keq), almost all are reactants. The particle diagram does NOT show equal numbers of reactant and product particles unless Keq ≈ 1.
What to write in your book
- Three snapshots: t=0 (all reactants), t=intermediate (ratio changing), t=equilibrium (stable ratio)
- Equilibrium ratio does NOT have to be equal — depends on Keq
- Same equilibrium reached from either direction (reactants or products side)
A reaction has Keq = 10⁶. At equilibrium, a particle diagram would show:
✏️ Worked Examples
For each scenario, identify whether the system is at static equilibrium, dynamic equilibrium, or neither. Justify your answer.
(a) A sealed flask containing H₂(g) and I₂(g) has been left for several hours at 450°C. The colour has stopped changing.
(b) A campfire has burned all its wood fuel and the ash is sitting cold on the ground.
(c) A beaker of water is evaporating in a warm room.
The reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g) is reversible (⇌). The system is closed (sealed flask). The colour has stopped changing → macroscopic properties are constant. Both conditions for dynamic equilibrium are met.
→ Dynamic equilibrium.
Combustion of wood is an irreversible reaction (large negative ΔG — products far more stable). All fuel has been consumed — the reaction has gone to completion. No reverse reaction occurs. Forward rate = 0, reverse rate = 0.
→ Static equilibrium.
The beaker is open — water vapour can escape to the surroundings and is not contained. This is an open system. Evaporation continues without the reverse process (condensation) catching up — the system cannot reach dynamic equilibrium. The water will eventually all evaporate.
→ Neither — open system, non-equilibrium.
Summary: (a) Dynamic equilibrium — reversible reaction in a closed system with stable macroscopic properties. (b) Static equilibrium — irreversible reaction gone to completion, all molecular activity has ceased. (c) Neither — open system, cannot reach dynamic equilibrium, water will completely evaporate.
A rate-vs-time graph shows two curves for a reversible reaction. Curve A starts at a high value and decreases to a constant non-zero value. Curve B starts at zero and increases to the same constant non-zero value as Curve A.
(a) Which curve represents the forward reaction rate and which represents the reverse? (b) At what point on the graph is dynamic equilibrium first established? (c) What would the graph look like if, after equilibrium was established, more reactant were added to the closed system?
Curve A starts high (maximum reactant concentration, maximum forward rate) and decreases as reactants are consumed → Curve A is the forward reaction rate.
Curve B starts at zero (no products initially, reverse rate = 0) and increases as products accumulate → Curve B is the reverse reaction rate.
Dynamic equilibrium is first established at the point where Curve A and Curve B meet and become equal — where both rates have the same non-zero value. This is the point where the curves intersect and both become horizontal.
Adding more reactant increases the concentration of reactants → forward rate increases immediately (Curve A spikes upward). Reverse rate is initially unchanged. Forward rate > reverse rate → system is no longer at equilibrium.
Over time, forward rate decreases (reactants consumed) and reverse rate increases (more products forming) until they equalise again at a new higher equilibrium rate.
A sudden upward spike in Curve A, followed by both curves settling to a new constant equal value — slightly higher than the original equilibrium rate.
Summary: (a) Curve A = forward rate; Curve B = reverse rate. (b) Equilibrium is established where the curves first intersect and both become horizontal. (c) Adding reactant causes a temporary spike in the forward rate curve; both curves then re-equalise at a new, slightly higher constant value.
Definitions
- Static equilibrium: irreversible reaction gone to completion; forward rate = reverse rate = 0
- Dynamic equilibrium: reversible reaction in a closed system where forward rate = reverse rate ≠ 0
- Closed system: matter cannot enter or leave (energy exchange permitted)
- Open system: matter can enter or leave; cannot achieve dynamic equilibrium
Conditions for Dynamic Equilibrium
- Reversible reaction (written with ⇌)
- Closed system (no matter escapes)
- Sufficient time for rates to equalise
- Both forward and reverse rates are equal AND non-zero
Rate-vs-Time Graph Key Features
- Forward rate starts at maximum, decreases as reactants consumed
- Reverse rate starts at zero, increases as products accumulate
- Equilibrium: both curves meet at same non-zero value and become horizontal
- After equilibrium: both rates remain constant and equal (non-zero)
Common Exam Errors — Avoid These
- Saying "equilibrium means equal concentrations" — WRONG; rates are equal
- Saying "the reaction has stopped" at dynamic equilibrium — WRONG; both rates non-zero
- Drawing forward rate curve falling to zero — WRONG at dynamic equilibrium
- Saying open system can reach dynamic equilibrium — WRONG
Activities
For each system below, classify it as static equilibrium, dynamic equilibrium, or neither. Then write a justification of one to two sentences explaining your answer.
Earn enough XP from the microtasks above to unlock Practice questions.
A sealed bottle of sparkling water sits on a bench. The CO&sub2; pressure gauge reads the same every minute. Predict: is this system at static equilibrium or dynamic equilibrium — and what is happening at the molecular level?
How close was your prediction?
Great — macroscopic stability + microscopic activity is the key distinction.
Remember: dynamic equilibrium looks “frozen” at the macro level, but at the molecular level both reactions are still running at equal rates.
Complete the Learn phase to unlock practice questions.
Compare and contrast static equilibrium and dynamic equilibrium. In your response, discuss: (a) the types of reactions that lead to each; (b) the molecular-level activity at each type of equilibrium; (c) how each would appear on a rate-vs-time graph; and (d) use specific chemical examples for each. (8 marks)
Look back at what you wrote in Think First. Recall Williamson's 1864 experiment: he measured the same ether-to-ethanol ratio whether he started from pure ethanol or pure ether — the forward and reverse reactions reaching the same equilibrium from opposite directions. Can you now explain in full chemical language why his result proves both reactions were running simultaneously? What did you get right? What surprised you?