Chemistry • Year 11 • Module 2 • Lesson 15

Gas Stoichiometry

Build HSC Band 5–6 extended-response technique on gas stoichiometry calculations, evaluating molar volume choices, and analysing a student’s systematic error.

Master · Extended Response

1. Data + scenario: ammonia synthesis at the Orica plant, Kooragang Island

9 marks   Band 5–6

Scenario. The Orica nitrogen plant at Kooragang Island, NSW, synthesises ammonia via the Haber process: N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g). An engineer measures gas flows and needs to calculate volumes at plant conditions. A student is asked to predict the volume of NH3 produced from a given volume of H2. The table below summarises measurements made at two different condition sets.

RunH2 volume fed inConditionsExpected V(NH3) produced (theoretical)
A9.00 LSATP (25 °C, 100 kPa)?
B9.00 LSTP (0 °C, 100 kPa)?

Assume 100% conversion for this theoretical calculation. All species are gases under both condition sets. Molar volumes: STP = 22.71 L mol−1; SATP = 24.8 L mol−1.

Q1. Analyse the data above by completing both calculations and then evaluating the significance of choosing the correct molar volume. In your response you must:

  • Calculate the expected volume of NH3 for both Run A (SATP) and Run B (STP), showing full working.
  • Identify which method you used (full 4-step or volume ratio shortcut) and justify your choice.
  • Quantify the absolute and percentage difference between the two answers.
  • Explain, in terms of Avogadro’s law and molar volume, why the volumes differ.
  • Evaluate what consequence using the wrong molar volume would have on an industrial gas measurement, using your numerical data.
Plan: Run A — all gases, same T and P → volume ratio = coefficient ratio; H2:NH3 = 3:2; V = 9.00 × (2 ÷ 3) = 6.00 L. Run B: same shortcut; same V(NH3) = 6.00 L. Then revisit: are the volumes actually different? They should be the same (mole ratios don’t depend on Vm). Explore why the question table hints they might differ, and what happens if a student mistakenly converts using the wrong Vm mid-calculation.

2. Experimental design — verifying the molar volume of CO2 at SATP

8 marks   Band 5–6

Research question. A Year 11 student wants to verify experimentally that the molar volume of CO2 at SATP (25 °C, 100 kPa) is approximately 24.8 L mol−1. They plan to use the decomposition of a known mass of marble chips (CaCO3) in excess hydrochloric acid: CaCO3(s) + 2HCl(aq) → CaCl2(aq) + H2O(l) + CO2(g).

Constraints: The student has access to: digital balance (±0.01 g), 250 mL conical flask, gas syringe (0–100 mL, ±0.5 mL), rubber stopper and delivery tube, thermometer, excess 1.0 mol L−1 HCl. The experiment must be completed in a single 60-minute laboratory session.

Q2. Design the investigation. Include all of the following:

  • State the hypothesis as a testable prediction including the expected molar volume value.
  • Identify the independent variable, dependent variable, and at least two controlled variables.
  • Describe a procedure in at least five numbered steps, including how molar volume will be calculated from the results.
  • Calculate the mass of CaCO3 needed to produce exactly 50.0 mL of CO2 at SATP (show working). Use this as your recommended sample size.
  • Identify two sources of error and explain how each would affect the calculated molar volume (would it be over- or under-estimated?).
Mass of CaCO3: n(CO2) = 0.0500 L ÷ 24.8 = 0.002016 mol; ratio 1:1; n(CaCO3) = 0.002016 mol; m = 0.002016 × 100.09 = 0.202 g. Errors: gas CO2 dissolving in water → less gas collected → V underestimated → Vm underestimated. Temperature above 25 °C (exothermic reaction) → gas expands → V overestimated → Vm overestimated.
Answers — Do not peek before attempting

Q1 — Sample Band 6 response (9 marks), annotated

Calculations — both runs:

For Run A (SATP) and Run B (STP): All species in N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g) are gases. By Avogadro’s law, at constant temperature and pressure, equal volumes contain equal moles, so the volume ratio equals the coefficient ratio directly — the volume ratio shortcut is valid for both runs [1 — method identified and justified].

H2:NH3 coefficient ratio = 3:2. V(NH3) = 9.00 × (2 ÷ 3) = 6.00 L for both Run A and Run B [1 — correct answer for Run A; 1 — correct answer for Run B].

Difference between runs: The theoretical V(NH3) is identical (6.00 L) in both cases because the volume ratio shortcut does not depend on the value of the molar volume — it depends only on the coefficient ratio [1]. Absolute difference = 0 L; percentage difference = 0%. The molar volume cancels out when all species are gases at the same T and P: the ratio V(H2) / V(NH3) = n(H2) × Vm / n(NH3) × Vm = n(H2) / n(NH3) regardless of Vm [1 — explanation with algebra or reasoning].

Where the wrong Vm causes an error: If a student mistakenly converts the 9.00 L of H2 to moles using the wrong molar volume before applying the ratio, then converts back, errors compound. Example: using Vm = 22.71 at SATP → n(H2) = 9.00 ÷ 22.71 = 0.3965 mol; n(NH3) = 0.3965 × (2 ÷ 3) = 0.2643 mol; V(NH3) = 0.2643 × 24.8 = 6.56 L — an error of 0.56 L (9.3%). The industrial consequence is a 9.3% mis-estimate of ammonia produced per batch; at industrial scale this could mean misallocation of storage tanks, incorrect billing of product, or safety risks from pressure build-up in downstream vessels [1 — consequence identified and quantified; 1 — industrial significance explained].

Avogadro’s law explanation: Avogadro’s law states that at constant T and P, equal volumes of all gases contain equal numbers of molecules. Therefore the mole ratio between H2 and NH3 is exactly reflected in their volume ratio (3 L H2 produces 2 L NH3). The molar volume value (22.71 or 24.8 L mol−1) sets the absolute scale but cancels in the ratio; the ratio is condition-independent as long as all species are at the same conditions [1 — Avogadro’s law correctly referenced].

Marking criteria summary (9 marks): 1 = identifies and justifies volume ratio shortcut. 1 = correct V(NH3) Run A = 6.00 L. 1 = correct V(NH3) Run B = 6.00 L. 1 = explains the two answers are equal with mathematical/logical reasoning. 1 = explains how molar volume cancels in the ratio (or equivalent algebraic reasoning). 1 = demonstrates a concrete worked example of the error caused by using the wrong Vm. 1 = quantifies the percentage error (9.3% or equivalent). 1 = identifies at least one industrial consequence. 1 = uses precise chemical vocabulary throughout (Avogadro’s law, molar volume, coefficient ratio, SATP, STP).

Q2 — Sample Band 6 response (8 marks), annotated

Hypothesis: If the molar volume of CO2 at SATP is 24.8 L mol−1, then when a known mass of CaCO3 is dissolved in excess HCl at 25 °C and 100 kPa, the ratio V(CO2) ÷ n(CO2) will equal 24.8 L mol−1. IV = mass of CaCO3; DV = volume of CO2 collected (mL); controlled: concentration of HCl (excess; 1.0 mol L−1), temperature (25 °C; measured with thermometer), pressure (100 kPa; atmospheric) [1 — hypothesis + IV, DV + 2 controlled variables].

Recommended sample mass calculation: n(CO2) = 0.0500 L ÷ 24.8 L mol−1 = 0.002016 mol; ratio 1:1 → n(CaCO3) = 0.002016 mol; m(CaCO3) = 0.002016 × 100.09 = 0.202 g [1 — correct mass with working].

Procedure: (1) Measure and record the laboratory temperature (aim 25 °C) and atmospheric pressure. (2) Accurately weigh 0.202 g of marble chips (CaCO3) on a balance (±0.01 g). (3) Add 50 mL of 1.0 mol L−1 HCl to the conical flask; connect the gas syringe via the rubber stopper and delivery tube; ensure all joints are airtight. (4) Add the marble chips to the flask and reseal immediately; record the syringe volume every 30 s until no further gas is produced. (5) Read the total volume of CO2 collected (V, mL) from the syringe when volume is stable. Calculate n(CaCO3) = m ÷ 100.09; since ratio is 1:1, n(CO2) = n(CaCO3); calculate experimental Vm = V(L) ÷ n(CO2) and compare to 24.8 L mol−1 [1 — five steps; 1 — calculation method described].

Error 1 — CO2 dissolving in water: CO2 is slightly soluble in water; some gas dissolves in the HCl solution rather than reaching the syringe. Result: V(CO2) collected is less than the true value → calculated Vm = V ÷ n is underestimated compared to 24.8 L mol−1 [1 — source identified; 1 — direction of error explained].

Error 2 — Reaction is exothermic; temperature above 25 °C: The reaction of CaCO3 with HCl releases heat; the solution temperature rises above 25 °C during the reaction. At higher temperatures, gas molecules have more kinetic energy and occupy more volume — V(CO2) is measured while hot, then the gas cools in the syringe after collection, giving an inflated volume reading. Result: V(CO2) measured is slightly greater than at true 25 °C → Vm is overestimated [1 — source identified; 1 — direction of error explained].

Marking criteria summary (8 marks): 1 = hypothesis + IV, DV, 2 controlled. 1 = correct mass calculation (0.202 g). 1 = procedure in at least 5 numbered steps. 1 = calculation of Vm described. 1 = source of error 1 (CO2 dissolution) identified. 1 = direction of error 1 on Vm (underestimate). 1 = source of error 2 (exothermic heating) identified. 1 = direction of error 2 on Vm (overestimate).