Biology • Year 11 • Module 3 • Lesson 7

Speciation

Apply allopatric speciation to new scenarios, classify reproductive barriers, reason about Australian marsupials, and interpret a speciation data scenario.

Apply · Data & Reasoning

1. Apply allopatric speciation — frog population

Read the scenario and answer the questions below. 8 marks

Scenario. A river in eastern Australia changes course over thousands of years, splitting a tree frog population into two groups: one on the northern bank and one on the southern bank. Over many generations, the northern population evolves a slightly different call frequency and the two groups now rarely respond to each other’s calls. When researchers bring individuals from both populations together, they attempt to mate only with members of their own group and rarely produce offspring with the other group. When hybrid tadpoles are produced, they develop more slowly and most fail to metamorphose.

1.1 Identify the type of speciation occurring and justify your choice. 2 marks

1.2 Identify one pre-zygotic and one post-zygotic reproductive barrier present in the scenario. Justify each. 4 marks

1.3 Would removing the river barrier at this point necessarily mean the two frog populations merge back into one species? Explain your reasoning. 2 marks

Stuck? Revisit Cards 1 and 2 in the lesson. Key ideas: the barrier starts the process; once reproductive isolation builds up, removing the barrier does not reverse it.

2. Allopatric vs sympatric speciation — comparison table

Complete the empty cells. 6 marks — 1 per cell

FeatureAllopatric speciationSympatric speciation
Geographic barrier required?Yes
How gene flow is blockedChromosome changes (e.g. polyploidy) or ecological differences
Common in which organisms?Many animal groups, including marsupials
Australian exampleBread wheat (hexaploid formed through hybridisation)
Key defining featurePhysical separation precedes reproductive isolation
Revisit Card 3 in the lesson — the comparison of allopatric and sympatric speciation.

3. Cause-and-effect chain — marsupial speciation in Australia

Complete the cause-and-effect chain. 5 marks

Start: Australia separated from the ancient supercontinent Gondwana and became geographically isolated from other landmasses.

Step 1: _________________________ between Australian mammal lineages and those on other landmasses stopped or became very limited.

Step 2: Marsupial lineages in Australia faced _________________________ selection pressures than placental mammals elsewhere and accumulated distinct _________________________ over millions of years.

Step 3: This is an example of _________________________ speciation, driven by the geographic barrier of oceanic isolation.

Outcome: Australia today has many _________________________ marsupial species — species found only in Australia — reflecting millions of years of independent evolution.

Revisit Card 2 in the lesson (Australian context: marsupials and Gondwana isolation) and the glossary for allopatric speciation and endemic species.
Answers — Do not peek before attempting

Q1.1 — Speciation type and justification

Allopatric speciation [1]. The river created a geographic barrier that physically separated one population into two isolated groups, reducing gene flow between them. Both groups then diverged independently (the northern population evolved a different call frequency), consistent with the definition of allopatric speciation as speciation driven by geographic isolation [1].

Q1.2 — Pre-zygotic and post-zygotic barriers

Pre-zygotic: The different call frequencies act as a pre-zygotic barrier [1] because the two groups rarely respond to each other’s calls and rarely attempt to mate — this prevents fertilisation from occurring in the first place (behaviour-based mating isolation before zygote forms) [1].

Post-zygotic: The failure of hybrid tadpoles to metamorphose is a post-zygotic barrier [1] because fertilisation does occur (hybrid offspring are produced) but those hybrids develop abnormally and most fail to survive to adulthood, blocking successful gene flow between the lineages [1].

Q1.3 — Does removing the barrier reverse speciation?

No, removing the river barrier would not necessarily cause the populations to merge back into one species [1]. Both pre-zygotic (behavioural) and post-zygotic (hybrid failure) reproductive isolation mechanisms have already developed. Even without the physical barrier, the two populations would rarely interbreed successfully and would not restore significant gene flow. The lesson notes that “even if contact returns, fertile interbreeding no longer occurs” — speciation is already complete or substantially advanced [1].

Q2 — Comparison table

  • Geographic barrier (sympatric): No — occurs in the same geographic area without physical separation.
  • How gene flow is blocked (allopatric): Physical geographic barrier (mountain, river, ocean, etc.) prevents contact and reduces gene flow.
  • Common in (sympatric): Plants (especially through polyploidy); also some animal examples through ecological specialisation.
  • Australian example (allopatric): Marsupial diversification after Australia’s separation from Gondwana.
  • Key defining feature (sympatric): Reproductive isolation arises within the same geographic area, usually through chromosome changes or strong ecological differences, without prior physical separation.

Award 1 mark per cell (6 cells in empty column). Accept valid answers consistent with lesson content.

Q3 — Cause-and-effect chain

  • Step 1: Gene flow [1]
  • Step 2: different; adaptations / mutations [1 for both; accept equivalent terms]
  • Step 3: allopatric [1]
  • Outcome: endemic [1]